| 英文摘要 |
1. Drafting Site Management Plan
In order to effectively utilize the Soil Pollution Fund, this project has consolidated background information for all the contaminated sites that had been announced over the years. Then, this project uses this information to review the effectiveness of site improvement process and act as a reference for future remediation for sites with similar situation. Additionally, current contaminated site status and problem encountered has been continuously tracked in order to promote site management plan and to avoid the emergence of stagnant site.
This project continues to review the Site Management Plan, and based on site characteristics and current site assessment results, the list of sites is then divided, scored and ranked respectively into prioritized remediation assessment and planning, land revitalization or regional development, remediation goals based on risk assessment, risk management sites, long-term monitored natural attenuation, pilot study sites, green energy subsidy sites and the illegal dump sites, so that the competent authority can evaluate the corresponding measures and decision-making. Also, a site-specific management page is built on the “Soil and Groundwater Information Management System” website in order to provide various management measures, such as screening criteria and weighted information.
2. Preliminary Site Assessment and Improvement Effectiveness Review
In order to speed up pollution improvement for the stagnant sites and reduce the number of declared contaminated sites, this project performs an inventory count for 96 stagnant sites and classifies them according to each site status.
In total, 58 stagnant sites are selected to conduct site survey and assessment work. In addition to tracking the site remediation progress, this project also works with the land stakeholders to help coordinating and gathering remediation resources for those sites whose potential polluters are uncertain. According to the site survey results, it can be categorized into: 1)17 sites that are willing to conduct remediation and subsequently transfer to the local EPB for continuous tracking and oversighting; 2)41 sites that have no intentions to conduct remediation but still assist in drafting the site de-listing plan for the promotion of proposed measures for the stagnation site. Additionally, 3 demonstrated sites are selected to perform preliminary site assessment and develop future site management and remediation strategies. Finally, site management recommendations are given to other sites based on site inventory analysis, site survey, assessment and additional investigation results.
3. Analysis and Optimization of Site KPI Management Framework
In order to be effectively take control of the contaminated site remediation progress, this projects strengthen current site KPI management framework by adding 3 new site KPI management functions, optimizing 20 site KPI processes, designing to add "Declared Contaminated Site Remediation Progress Display Function", "Stagnant Site and Routine Monitoring Site Management Function", and 6 site performance assessment indicators. Additionally, 27 anomaly site data recorded by EPA are analyzed and evaluated.
This project also sets up a site KPI customer service phone number to help environmental protection agency solving problems related to contaminated sites. On August 6, 2019, “2019 Annual Site KPI Process Management Training” was held and all the frequently asked questions are consolidated into "KPI Process Management System Q＆A".
|