環境資源報告成果查詢系統

107年建置我國環境用藥藥效檢測技術規範計畫

中文摘要 中華民國 90 年頒布實施環境衛生用藥藥效測試通則闡明環境衛生用藥不論是家庭用或專業用藥,都必須通過藥效測試才能保證具有基本的殺蟲效果;含蚊香劑、噴霧劑之玻璃筒法、玻璃箱法及玻璃室法對多種環境有害生物之測試方法規範。實施至今已逾15年,因環境用藥與時俱進且多元,現今有許多新劑型,原先規範已不敷應用,需重新研析評估及制定藥效檢測技術規範。於106年已完成研析現行10項環境用藥藥效檢測方法修正之必要性、建立14種供試昆蟲之管理技術規範、建立試驗規格設備 (包括殘效接觸法試驗裝置、爬行性昆蟲驅出試驗裝置、防蟲試驗裝置、防蚊試驗裝置、食餌試驗裝置等)、對已建立之藥效檢測方法再評估,包括蚊香劑、電蚊香劑、液體電蚊香劑及高壓噴霧劑對供試昆蟲藥效檢測方法 (玻璃筒法、玻璃箱法、玻璃室法及殘效接觸法等) 技術規範;並建立乳劑、超低容量劑、燻煙劑對供試昆蟲藥效檢測方法技術規範;建立餌劑、凝膠餌劑、片劑及塊劑對爬行性昆蟲藥效檢測方法技術規範;及建立臺灣環境用藥新劑型藥效檢測方法技術規範,包括空間噴霧劑及防蚊網對飛行性昆蟲之藥效檢測方法技術規範。 107年本計畫已完成完成 8 項現行規範及 8 項106年修正規範之再現性誤差之比較:以玻璃筒法、玻璃箱法及玻璃室法測試病媒蚊對蚊香類劑型、高壓噴霧劑、高壓噴霧劑 (塵蟎) 之半數擊昏時間 (KT50) 及 24小時死亡率再現性相關系數,皆有顯著性相關 (p<0.05),玻璃室法 KT50 未能符合藥效檢測審查基準,而其他均可適用;完成使用殘效接觸法試驗裝置,測試爬行性昆蟲對 3 種市售乳劑及 5 種市售噴霧劑之藥效檢測,皆達藥效檢測基準可適用,但對飛行性昆蟲使用殘效接觸法試驗裝置藥效結果不彰,應採用空間噴灑方式;完成爬行類昆蟲驅離試驗裝置測試片劑、粒劑、錠劑各 3 種之藥效試驗方法,市售片劑 B 產品及 C 產品未達審查基準,但對 3 種粒劑及 3 種錠劑皆可適用,可於106年建立之片劑藥效檢測技術規範,增列粒劑及錠劑劑型;完成防蟲試驗裝置測試市售片劑、粒劑、錠劑各3 種之藥效試驗方法,僅鰹節蟲對片劑 C 未達審查基準,但對 3 種粒劑及 3 種錠劑皆可適用,可於106年建立之片劑藥效檢測技術規範,增列粒劑及錠劑劑型;完成防蚊試驗裝置測試市售 2 種片劑之藥效試驗方法,皆達藥效檢測審查基準,技術規範可適用;完成空間噴霧劑及防蚊網之藥效檢測方法技術規範再評估皆達藥效檢測基準,故106年建立技術規範可適用;但空間噴霧劑採玻璃室法,其 KT50 未能符合藥效檢測審查基準;完成建立人用化學防蚊液之藥效檢測方法,供後續相關藥效檢測方法擬定之參考依據,以利人用化學防蚊忌避劑業務之推動;就現行藥效檢測方法之合宜性作必要之修正,以為未來修正公告藥效檢測方法之參考依據實際已完成進度100 %,符合期末報告100 % 要求。
中文關鍵字 環境害蟲、環境用藥、殺蟲劑、藥效測試

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 TCSB-107-HC04-02-A015 經費年度 107 計畫經費 2750 千元
專案開始日期 2018/01/12 專案結束日期 2018/12/31 專案主持人 白秀華
主辦單位 化學局 承辦人 陳家齊 執行單位 國立高雄大學

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 107年建置我國環境用藥藥效檢測技術規範計畫.pdf 6MB 期末成果報告

2018 Plan on the Establishment for the Technical Specifications of the Environmental Pesticides Efficacy Test in Taiwan

英文摘要 The guideline of the efficacy test for environmental pesticides issued and implemented in 2001 stated that the insecticidal efficacy of environmental pesticides can only be guaranteed after they have passed the efficacy test, no matter whether they are applied for family or professional use. Moreover, the guideline contains a test method and specification for the efficacy of mosquito repellent agent and spray (glass column method, glass chamber method, and glass room method) against a variety of environmentally harmful organisms. Up to current time, this procedure has been carried out for more than 15 years. As environmental pesticides have kept pace with the times in diversified forms, many new drug forms have appeared, yet the original specifications have lost their applicability. As such, the current specifications need to be reanalyzed and evaluated, and a new efficacy test specification needs to be established. In 2017, a re-analysis and evaluation on the efficacy test method for 10 current environmental pesticides were completed, proving the necessity for modification; the managing technique specification against 14 testing insects was set up, along with the specification on test devices (including test apparatus for residual contact method, test apparatus for expelling crawling insects, devices for insect repellent test and mosquito repellent test, bait test devices, etc.). A re-evaluation was conducted on the established efficacy test methods, including the efficacy test technical specification of mosquito repellent agent, electric mosquito repellent agent, liquid electric mosquito repellent agent, and high-pressure spray against testing insects (glass column method, glass chamber method, glass room method, residual contact method, etc.). The efficacy test technical specification of emulsion, ultra-low capacity agent, and fumigant against testing insects was also set up. A technical specification for the efficacy test of baits, gel baits, tablets, and patches against reptile insects was put in place as well. The establishment of the efficacy test technical specification of new drug forms of environmental pesticides in Taiwan was also accomplished, including the efficacy test technical specification of space spray and anti-mosquito net against flying insects. In 2018, this study completed a comparison of the reproducibility error between eight current codes, as well as the eight amended codes in 2017, namely the glass column method, glass chamber method, and glass room method. Tests were conducted on the time (KT50) for one half of vector mosquitoes to be killed in terms of mosquito coil forms, high-pressure spray and high-pressure spray (dust mite), and the reproducibility correlation coefficient of the 24-hour death rate. The results showed a significant correlation (p<0.05) in all of them. Here, KT50 of the glass room method failed to meet the efficacy test review standards, but all others were applicable. The efficacy test method of 3 commercially available emulsions and 5 commercially available sprays on crawling insects by using a residual effect contact method test device was completed, and all the emulsion and spray products met efficacy test standards and were applicable. However, the efficacy test results on flying insects by using the residual effect contact method test device were not significant, and thus the space spraying method should be used instead. The efficacy test method of tablet, granula, and pastille on crawling insects by using a repelling test device was completed, and the results showed that commercially available tablet products B and C failed to meet review standards, while 3 granulas and 3 pastilles were applicable. Granula and pastille can be added in the technical specifications for the tablet efficacy test developed in 2017. The efficacy test method of the commercially available tablet, granula, and pastille by using an insect control test device was completed. The method failed to meet the review standards for dermestidae in terms of tablet C, but was applicable to 3 granulas and 3 pastilles. Granula and pastille can be added in the technical specifications for the tablet efficacy test developed in 2017. The efficacy test method of 2 commercially available tablets by using a mosquito prevention test device was completed. The efficacy test standards were satisfied by all tablets, and the technical specifications were applicable. A reassessment of technical specifications regarding the efficacy test method of space spray and mosquito screen was completed, and the efficacy test standards were satisfied by both space spray and mosquito screen; therefore, the technical specifications developed in 2017 were applicable; however, KT50 of space spray by using the glass room method failed to meet the efficacy test review standards. The efficacy test method of a chemical mosquito repellent liquid for human use was established, as a reference for the preparation of subsequent efficacy test methods, in order to facilitate the business promotion of chemical mosquito repellent for human use. A necessary amendment has been made as to the suitability of the current efficacy test method, providing a reference for a future amendment to the published efficacy test method, which meets all the requirements in the final report.
英文關鍵字 environmental pests, environmental agents, insecticides, efficacy testing