環境資源報告成果查詢系統

107年雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼渣沼液農地肥分使用推動暨評估計畫(後續擴充)

中文摘要 本擴充計畫主要進行已核定施灌之成效追蹤、推廣畜牧糞尿資源化利用及成立施灌運輸車隊,在已核准通過申請,可進行沼液沼渣施灌之畜牧場成效追蹤方面,已完成72點次地下水豐、枯水期監測(包含複測12點次、不包含環保署監測站及扣除共用地下水監測井重複之點次)及87點次土壤監測作業,其監測結果土壤均未超過土壤污染監測標準,而在地下水監測方面,枯水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有8點次(5點次為上游,3點次為下游);豐水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有6點次(4點次為上游,2點次為下游) 經探討監測井位於施灌範圍上游,應非為本案施灌沼液所造成,而下游超標之畜牧場,經檢視施灌紀錄後,兩場之監測井為同一口,且106年度之監測數據均未超過停灌標準,應為該口井之單一情況,一場未有施灌行為,另一場施灌量僅占核定施灌量之22.8 %,故推測下游氨氮超標亦應非為施灌沼液、沼渣所造成,且停灌應以監測數據有明顯上升趨勢為基準,後續仍將持續監測,以釐清氨氮測值是否有明顯上升,現階段建議場家可持續施灌。另於每三個月追蹤施灌情形,及已協助29場場家提出施灌評析報告。 在推廣畜牧糞尿資源化利用方面,已依據廢(污)水處理設施設計處理水量、廢(污)水排放量及可再處理之餘裕量篩選22場畜牧業者進行推廣,並調查鄰近推廣場家5公里範圍內之畜牧場所在區域、飼養規模、廢(污)水排放量、可用之農地面積等,及研擬畜牧糞尿資源化推動可行性策略,截至11月30日已完成22場之輔導與實地調查,有意願者共19場,其中有11場願意收受他場豬糞尿進場處理,包含於6月20日、8月29日、9月21日及10月18日已協助提出申請之5場畜牧業者、資料收集中1場、尚須媒合其他畜牧場2場、與廠商洽談中2場、願意被收受1場;無意願收受他場糞尿入場8場中,其原因主要為只想做自場發電、防疫問題或者已申請農委會補助。 以提出申請之5場場家估算,預計每年之資源化利用量292,605.9公噸,每天約可削減BOD 5,371.1公斤、SS 6,333.1公斤、NH3-N 308.6公斤,其污染削減量達環保署訂定之污染削減量目標值,可望改善關鍵測站污染負荷,並減少約1,579,270元之水污染防治費、增加約11,582,910元之售電收入。 另已完成7場宣導會或研商會議,參與人數達116人、10月30日辦理畜牧糞尿資源化成果發表記者會、11月1日~3日辦理1場次畜牧糞尿資源化處理計畫觀摩活動,帶領參訪者了解沼氣發電、沼液沼渣施灌、農業廢棄物發展成再生能源(燃料棒)及固形廢棄物之循環再利用,實際參與人數達71人,惟部分參與人員因個人因素、工作時間無法全程參與,經統計全程參與觀摩活動的人數為40人、編製500份摺頁及製作13場畜牧場之沼液沼渣農地肥分使用成果易拉展。 在建立沼液沼渣肥分使用運輸施灌體系方面,經統計購置施灌車輛或農地貯存桶意願,有意申請之畜牧業者共計12家,無意願申請場家共計58家,探究主因多為已有槽車、主要為管線施灌、購置經費過高,無法負擔、補助購買槽車的載重噸數超過3.5噸,需有大貨車駕照才能駕駛或農地貯存桶會佔用到耕作面積等,另根據施灌車輛之調查進行建置沼液沼渣肥分使用運輸施灌體系之媒合。本擴充計畫已於7月10、11日協助第一批有意申請之12家畜牧業者提出沼液沼渣施灌營運計畫書,另於11月27、28日協助第二批有意願申請之畜牧業者提出沼液沼渣施灌營運計畫書,合計預購置購置9個農地貯存槽與7台施灌車輛,且陸續協助畜牧業者於施灌車輛或施灌桶槽進行「農地沼液沼渣施灌」字樣之噴漆作業。
中文關鍵字 沼液沼渣、畜牧業、示範場

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 107-018-1 經費年度 107 計畫經費 2640 千元
專案開始日期 2018/05/12 專案結束日期 2018/11/30 專案主持人 黃招斌
主辦單位 雲林縣環境保護局 承辦人 甘尚玉 執行單位 元科科技股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 107年雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼渣沼液農地肥分使用推動暨評估計畫(後續擴充)-期末報告(定稿).pdf 8MB 107年雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼渣沼液農地肥分使用推動暨評估計畫(後續擴充)-期末報告(定稿)

2018 Survey and Promotion of Biogas Fermentation Residue as Fertilizer for Animal Husbandry in Yunlin County(the subsequent extension)

英文摘要 This extended plan mainly carries out the effectiveness tracking of approved irrigation, promotes the utilization of animal husbandry and urine resources, and sets up a fleet of irrigation and transportation vehicles. Regarding the effectiveness tracking of livestock farms that have been approved for application of biogas fermentation residue, there are 72 times of groundwater monitoring for high and low water level periods (including 12 times of retest, excluding EPA monitoring station and shared groundwater monitoring well) and 87 times of soil monitoring operations which have been completed. The monitoring results have not exceeded the soil pollution monitoring standards. Regarding the groundwater monitoring, there are 8 times (5 times for the upstream and 3 times for the downstream) after the retesting in the low water level period. The overtake number after the retest in the high water level period is 6 times (4 for the upstream and 2 for the downstream). It is because the monitoring well is located in the upstream of the irrigation area, and it should not be caused by the application of the biogas fermentation residue in this case. In addition, the livestock farms that exceeded the standard in the downstream, after examining the records of irrigation, in the case of an unapplied behavior, the other application amount only accounts for 22.8% of the approved irrigation amount. Therefore, it is suspected that the downstream ammonia nitrogen exceeding standard should not be caused by the application of biogas fermentation residue, and the monitoring data should be obvious. The upward trend is the benchmark, and groundwater will continue to be monitored in order to clarify whether there is a significant increase in the ammonia nitrogen measurement. At this stage, it is recommended that the farmers can continue irrigation. Moreover, the irrigation condition was tracked every three months, and there are 29 field experts submit the evaluation report. As for the promotion of animal husbandry utilization, the amount of water, waste (sewage) water discharge and reprocessing margin have been designed according to waste (sewage) water treatment facilities. We selected 22 animal husbandry operators for promotion, and investigated the raising scale, waste (sewage) water discharge, and available agricultural land area within 5km of the livestock farms operators, as well as developed feasibility strategies for animal husbandry and urine resources. As of November 30, 22 counseling and field surveys have been completed. There are 19 sessions with willingness, 11 of which are willing to accept the pig manure and urine, including the 5 which has been applied on June 20, August 29, September 21 and October 18. There are 1 sessions of composing, 2 sessions of livestock farm matching, 2 sessions of negotiation, 1 session of acceptance. There are 8 sessions that are not willing to accept the admission of other fields. The main reason is that they only want to do self-power generation, and the epidemic prevention problem has been applied for by the Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Regarding 5 animal husbandry applications, it is estimated that the annual resource utilization will be 292,605.9 metric tons, the daily reduction of BOD is 5,371.1 kg, SS is 6,333.1 kg, and NH3-N is 308.6 kg. The pollution reduction amount reached the target set by the Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan. It is expected to improve the pollution load of key monitoring stations, reduce the water pollution control cost of about 1,579,270 NTD, and got 11,582,910 NTD revenue from sales of electricity sales. In addition, there have been 7 publicity meetings or seminars completed, with 116 participants, a press conference on the results of livestock and feces and urinary resources held on October 30, and 1 animal husbandry and feces recycling treatment plan observation and learning activity from November 1 to 3, 2018. It brought visitors to understand the recycling of biogas power generation, biogas fermentation residue, agricultural waste developed into renewable energy (fuel rods) and solid waste recycling. The actual number of participants was 71, but some participants were unable to participate in the whole process due to personal factors. According to statistics, the number of people participating in the observation and learning activity was 40, 500 leaflets were prepared, and 13 roll up banners were made to demonstrate the outcomes of the use of the biogas fermentation residue as fertilizer for animal husbandry. As for the establishment of biogas fermentation residue fertilizer transportation and irrigation system, according to the statistics, there are 12 animal husbandry applicants who are willing to apply for the application of the vehicle or the farmland storage bucket, whereas 58 applicants with unwillingness. The main reason for the investigation is that the purchase funds for the existing tank trucks, mainly for pipeline irrigation are too high. The subsidy for the purchase of tank trucks exceeds 3.5 tons, required a large truck driver's license. In addition, we also carried out the construction of the liquid and sewage residue and the use of the transportation and irrigation system according to the investigation of the application of the vehicle. The implementation of this expansion plan assisted 12 animal husbandry companies who are willing to apply for biogas fermentation residue irrigation operation plan on July 10 and 11. The project team assisted the second batch of animal husbandry who wished to apply for a biogas fermentation residue operation plan on November 27 and 28. A total of 9 farmland storage buckets and 7 irrigation vehicles were purchased in advance. We continue to assist animal husbandry to carry out the painting of “farmland biogas fermentation residue irrigation” in the vehicles or tanks.
英文關鍵字 biogas fermentation、animal husbandry、demonstrative areas