環境資源報告成果查詢系統

水污染防治費徵收推動及生活污水管理工作計畫

中文摘要 本計畫分析事業廢水排放特性及水體水質變化,強化徵收公平性,並評估以差別收費提升污染削減之誘因機制。調查可能運作排放卻未申報水污費項目之特定業別,對重金屬關聯業別、燃煤事業、稽查檢測與許可不符者進行水質檢驗,為求收費公平性以反映污染物排放狀況,根據水質調查結果,研議依原物料、產品、製程及稽查結果勾稽重金屬、氰化物之運作紀錄,針對水污費申報項目與實際運作排放不符者,取消該免檢測申報項目並登載於許可證文件,如實收費。 本計畫依時間(豐枯水期)或空間(總量管制區及特予保護水體)評估水污費差別費率,結果顯示全國河川豐、枯水期不一,且水質與流量未呈現中高度相關,此外,依空間差別費率之評估結果顯示特定區域範圍僅少數事業水污費產生差異且增加費額較少,似不符以經濟誘因抑制污染排放量之效果,在現行制度架構下推動有其侷限性。 有關生活污水管理,考量排放於自來水水質水量保護區內之建築物與小型聚落,其放流水應符合氨氮及正磷酸鹽管制限值,宜訂有相關設計技術規範及審定登記範本,俾利業者遵循。此外,合併式淨化槽(套裝處理設施)用於收集處理小型聚落之生活污水,建議下水道主管機關得視當地環境特性及環境保護需要,設置專用下水道系統,俾利後續追蹤管理。
中文關鍵字 水污費徵收勾稽檢核、水污費差別收費機制、生活污水排放源管理

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 109 計畫經費 4720 千元
專案開始日期 2020/02/17 專案結束日期 2020/11/30 專案主持人 朱敬平
主辦單位 水保處 承辦人 洪立羣 執行單位 財團法人中興工程顧問社

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 水污染防治費徵收推動及生活污水管理工作計畫.pdf 16MB

Levied Water Pollution Control Fee and Management of Domestic Wastewater

英文摘要 In the project, water body water quality and characteristics of industrial pollutant discharge were analyzed to improve water pollution control fee imposition scheme, and also to elevate the incentives of pollution reduction. This study investigated and sampled the specific industry, heavy metal-related industries, coal-fired industries and permit-violation industries, which may operate and discharge levied pollutants but didn’t declare the water pollution control fee. Based on the results of effluent test, this study suggests reviewing aforementioned industries’ operation records of heavy metals and cyanides among the raw materials, products, manufacturing processes, and audit results. Aim water pollution control fee declared items that are inconsistent with operation, then the government should cancel the test-exemption declaration item and record it in the permit. This project evaluated the differential rates of water pollution control fee according to seasons (high and low water level periods) or water bodies (pollution control areas and specially protected water bodies). The results show that there isn’t clear consistent periods of high and low water level in the nationwide rivers, and also the water quality and flow rate do not show a medium to high correlation. In addition, the evaluation results that only a few factories in pollution control areas or specially protected water bodies will be levied higher but limited fees, which couldn’t achieve the effect of economic incentives to suppress pollution discharge. On the consequence, based on current Water pollution control fee levied system, the above method is not suggested. Regarding the management of domestic sewage, considering the buildings and small settlements discharged into the water quality and quantity protection zone, the discharge water should meet the standard for ammonia nitrogen and orthophosphate. It is advised that the “Technical Code for Design of Building Sewage Treatment Facilities” and the templates should provide complete design specification to the function of nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Moreover, the combined johkasou (packaged wastewater treatment facility) is used to collect and treat domestic sewage in small settlements. It is recommended that the competent authority could consider the local environmental protection necessity to assign the combined johkasou as a private sewer system for later tracking management.
英文關鍵字 Water pollution control fee intercomparison and inspection, ater pollution control fee at differentiated rate, Domastic wastewater source management