環境資源報告成果查詢系統

森林碳匯、原住民與氣候調適研析與培力計畫

中文摘要 本研究嘗試回應原住民族在氣候時代的定位、剖析原住民族面臨的處遇並探討森林碳匯(不限於碳權)如何成為原住民族發展與氣候調適的機遇。 為此,研究回顧2010至2021年間國內媒體報導,發現原住民、氣候變遷與脆弱議題報導少(32則),內容經常與災害連結,並涉及正義與平權等課題;碳匯報導(109則)高達九成意指森林碳匯,直至2021年才有涉及原住民族與森林碳權報導。透過政府研究資訊系統(GRB)瀏覽2001年至2021年間國內研究,森林碳匯相關研究(68件)多為方法學或量測實證研究,政策研究少且跨學門之森林碳匯法學研究闕如,亟待建構。 研析之日、韓、中、英與歐盟等國家自訂貢獻(NDC)雖未具體說明森林碳匯政策,但均肯認其自然價值;極少數國家將碳權與土地或森林所有權(公共、私人或集體)聯繫起來,國外研究亦呈現多元碳匯方法學但少有制度建構趨勢。 為普及原住民族對於本主題之認識,研究團隊已於西部地區15所偏遠地區原鄉國小,推動「森林碳匯與氣候調適」為主題之展覽,服務學生860人次;並辦理3場「森林碳匯、原住民與氣候變遷」議題交流會,邀請超過百位民眾參與討論。 研究認為,臺灣原住民族在森林以國有為主、土地利用與環境法規等多重限制下,隔絕於國家與森林有關之減量與調適工作之外,無法從中取得氣候調適所需之資金、技術與知能培力,不利臺灣淨零目標達成。 為扭轉此不利處境,研究團隊提出之立即可行建議為:一、重視森林碳匯議題深度,深化能力建構內涵並持續辦理原鄉氣候教育;中期建議包含:二、釐清森林碳匯真義,賦予非碳效益價值,納入碳抵換制度之設計。三、於淨零路徑內,創造原住民參與森林碳匯經營條件,從原住民保留地開始擴散;長期建議為:四、承認原住民族和當地社區權利,擴大森林碳匯範疇至傳統領域,以回應促進轉型正義條例的不足。
中文關鍵字 氣候變遷、森林碳匯、原住民族

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 110 計畫經費 1980 千元
專案開始日期 2020/10/20 專案結束日期 2022/08/31 專案主持人 謝英士
主辦單位 環管處 承辦人 陳立蓉 執行單位 財團法人環境品質文教基金會

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 @森林碳匯、原住民與氣候調適研析與培力計畫成果報告(定稿本)(1214-2修訂).pdf 3MB

Forest Carbon Sink, Indigenous People and Climate Change Adaptation Research and Awareness Building Program

英文摘要 This study attempts to respond to the positioning of indigenous peoples in the climate era, analyze the treatment faced by indigenous peoples, and explore how forest carbon sinks (not limited to carbon rights or carbon credit calculation) become opportunities for indigenous peoples to develop and adapt to climate. To this end, the study reviewed domestic media reports from 2010 to 2021 and found that there were few reports on indigenous peoples, climate change and vulnerability (32 articles), the content was often linked to disasters, and related topics such as justice and equality; carbon sink related reports (109 articles) up to 90% refers to forest carbon sinks, and there will be no reports involving indigenous peoples and forest carbon rights until 2021. Browsing domestic research from 2001 to 2021 through the Government Research Bulletin (GRB), most of the forest carbon sequestration-related research (68 studies) were methodological or quantitative empirical research, policy research was less, and cross-disciplinary forest carbon sequestration legal research was absent. , which needs to be constructed urgently. Although the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) of countries such as Japan, South Korea, China, the United Kingdom and the European Union do not specify the forest carbon sink policy, they all recognize its natural value. Very few countries associate carbon rights with land or forest ownership (public, private or collective), foreign trends also present multiple carbon sink methodologies but less institutional construction. In order to popularize the indigenous people's understanding of this topic, the research team has promoted an exhibition with the theme of "Forest Carbon Sequestration and Climate Adjustment" in 15 rural elementary schools in remote areas in the western region, serving 860 students. And organized three workshops on "Forest Carbon Sink, Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change", inviting more than 100 people to participate in the discussion. The research team believes that indigenous people in Taiwan are isolated from forest-related mitigation and adaptation work by the state due to multiple restrictions such as national forests, land use and environmental regulations Indigenous peoples are unable to obtain the finance, technology and capacity building required for climate adaptation, which is not conducive to the achievement of Taiwan's net zero goal. In order to reverse the above disadvantages, the immediately feasible recommendation put forward by the research team is as follows: (1) Pay attention to the depth of forest carbon sink issues, deepen the connotation of capacity building and continue to conduct climate education in the indigenous areas; The mid-term recommendations include: (2) Clarify the true meaning of forest carbon sinks, assign “non-carbon benefits” and incorporate them into the design of the carbon offset system. (3) Within the net-zero path, create conditions for indigenous people to participate in the management of forest carbon sinks, and start from the Aboriginal Reserve; And the long-term recommendation is: (4) Recognize the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, and expand the scope of forest carbon sinks to traditional areas to respond to the insufficiency of the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice.
英文關鍵字 Climate Change, Forest Carbon Sink, Indigenous Peoples