環境資源報告成果查詢系統

111年度桃園市有害空氣污染物調查管制計畫

中文摘要 本計畫完成之工作:(1)37家次戴奧辛排放源工廠運作法規符合度現場查核及建檔;(2)131件次戴奧辛排放源申報資料、檢測報告審查與建檔及11家次工廠稽查、定期、改善、操作許可申請等檢測現場監督;(3)8根次排放管道戴奧辛稽查檢測;(4)5根次重點行業管道重金屬排放特性檢測;(5)9月次特定工業區環境空氣有害空氣污染物監測;(6)3處戴奧辛污染源密集地區四季環境大氣戴奧辛現況調查;(7)20根次排放管道有機有害空氣污染物排放調查檢測及6根次排放管道有機有害空氣污染物稽查檢測;(8)3根次重點行業管道PM2.5排放特性檢測;(9)協助分析美福倉儲及家樂福倉儲火災期間之污染物監測;(10)空污事件現場應變標準作業程序修正、災害空污事件緊急應變系統維護更新、空氣污染突發事故緊急應變措施計畫送件及審查系統與稽巡查系統與資料庫維護;(11)辦理環境教育訓練講習及法規說明會議;(12)有害空氣污染物排放與健康風險關聯性分析,符合服務建議書之規劃。 本計畫現場查核工作共計清查37家次戴奧辛排放源,清查工作針對列管廠家之戴奧辛排放源的進料量、焚化設備操作、污染防制設備運轉狀況、採樣設施條件等現場各項操作參數以科學儀器進行查驗,以有效管控各廠防制設備操作狀況,計有9家次固定污染源操作現況不符合操作許可證,被要求進行改善及追蹤其改善完成。 本計畫審查131件次桃園市境內列管之戴奧辛排放源所申報之檢測報告書、檢測計畫書及其他相關資料,執行17家次列管戴奧辛排放源之檢測現場監督工作,計有3家次因採樣設備損壞或採樣流程不符合規範,被要求擇日重新採樣。 執行8根次列管戴奧辛排放源稽查檢測工作,不符合排放標準者共1家次,為使用SRF與廢橡膠為燃料之鍋爐,不符合「中小型廢棄物焚化爐戴奧辛管制及排放標準」-設計處理量達四公噸/小時以上者戴奧辛排放限值之規定。 111年度各戴奧辛排放源之戴奧辛年排放量,大型焚化爐年度排放量為0.032 g-TEQ/year,中型焚化爐為0.013 g-TEQ/year,小型焚化爐為0.042 g-TEQ/year,電弧爐為1.50 g-TEQ/year,輔助燃料-廢液為0.007 g-TEQ/year,輔助燃料-污泥/SRF為0.408 g-TEQ/year,輔助燃料-木屑為0.069 g-TEQ/year,輔助燃料-水煤漿為0.017 g-TEQ/year,鍋爐發電或汽電共生燃煤鍋爐為0.120 g-TEQ/year,火化場為0.0007 g-TEQ/year,銅二級冶煉為0.180 g-TEQ/year,鋁及其他金屬二級冶煉為0.016 g-TEQ/year,其他製程行業別為0.017 g-TEQ/year,桃園市111年總排放量為2.423 g-TEQ/year,約占環保署推估之109年度全國戴奧辛年排放量(47.7 g-TEQ/year)之1/20。 本計畫完成9月次特定工業區-桃園環保科技園區下風處環境空氣戴奧辛檢測調查及4季戴奧辛污染源密集地區-新屋區永安國小、觀音區樹林國小、大園區潮音國小共計5處環境空氣戴奧辛檢測調查工作,空氣中戴奧辛濃度範圍介於0.014 ~ 0.792 pg TEQ/Nm3,平均值為0.146 pg-TEQ/m3,與環保署於23個空氣品質測站的監測值為高(濃度範圍為N.D.~0.120 pg-TEQ/m3,平均值為0.022 pg-TEQ/m3),低於日本周界空氣戴奧辛環境品質基準年平均值0.6 pg-TEQ/Nm3。 桃園環保科技園區周界空氣中重金屬與揮發性有機物等有害空氣污染物監測結果除符合「固定污染源有害空氣污染物排放標準」中的周界標準外,也符合世界衛生組織(WHO)、歐盟執委會(EC)、日本環境省以及美國德州環境品質委員會(TCEQ)等單位訂定之標準值;空氣中酸鹼氣體僅測得鹽酸及氨氣,其監測結果均低於「固定污染源空氣污染物排放標準」中的周界標準值。 本年度針對SRF為燃料的鍋爐進行調查,永豐餘消費品實業楊梅廠的PM2.5質量濃度為7.85 mg/Nm3,是以CPM為主,成分主要是硫酸鹽、鈉離子、氯鹽;大園汽電共生P401 的PM2.5質量濃度為20.7 mg/Nm3,以CPM為主,成分主要是硫酸鹽、鈉離子、氯鹽,因兩廠製程均有噴注尿素削減氮氧化物,以致於廢氣中會有硫酸鹽、銨離子等物種,經排放後會再大氣中形成硫酸銨等氣膠。 海湖國小FTIR 測得污染物為氨氣、環己烷、二氯甲烷、乙醇、乙酸乙酯、異丙醇、甲烷、甲醇、正丁烷、氯乙烯等10種污染物,監測期間中有乙酸乙酯超過周界標準與嗅覺閾值;氯乙烯於111月10日 08:00~09:00有高值出現,5分鐘瞬間最大濃度監測濃度範圍為ND~116 ppb,小時平均濃度為17.7 ppb,未超過周界標準20 ppb。 列管工廠之空氣污染突發事故緊急應變措施計畫書申報系統完成建置並持續維護,工廠將各項資料直接於線上填寫或上傳,填寫完畢後,可轉變為措施計畫書,並於線上進行審查,以利局內後續將所有廠商資料轉為電子化建檔,並於後續環保署新增化學品列管工廠時,可運用本空氣污染突發事故緊急應變措施計畫書申報系統快速進行審查。 由VOC排放量前百大且有使用「固定污染源有害空氣污染物排放標準」中列管物料的固定污染源進行篩選,執行排放管道有機物排放現況調查9廠20根次與稽查檢測6廠6根次,其中萬洲化學楊梅二廠P205與東陽實業觀音廠P101、P102、P103的管道排放調查結果的甲苯排放濃度不符「固定污染源有害空氣污染物排放標準」,後續將配合台曼公司進行減量輔導;針對防制設備為洗滌塔或吸脫附設備且未提送風險管理計畫的固定污染源執行排放管道有害有機污染物稽查檢測至今完成6根次,稽查結果皆符合排放標準。
中文關鍵字 有害空氣污染物、戴奧辛、細懸浮微粒

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 111 計畫經費 2890 千元
專案開始日期 2022/01/04 專案結束日期 2022/12/31 專案主持人 杜敬民
主辦單位 桃園市政府環境保護局 承辦人 游裕翔技士 執行單位 財團法人工業技術研究院

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 111年度桃園市有害空氣污染物調查管制計畫期末報告計畫成果摘要.pdf 0MB 計畫成果摘要

This project is management and assistance of hazardous air pollutant and fine particle matter emission (2022)

英文摘要 The plan includes: (1) on-site inspections and filing of operation regulation compliance of 37 Dioxin emission source factories; (2) inspections and filing of declared data and test reports for 131 Dioxin emission sources and supervision of inspections, regular intervals, improvements, and applications for operation licenses for 11 factories; (3) Dioxin inspections of eight drain pipes; (4) inspections of heavy metal emission characteristics of five key industrial pipes; (5) monitoring of hazardous air pollutants in the ambient air at specific industrial areas over nine months; (6) investigations into the status of atmospheric Dioxin in three areas with intensive pollution sources across four seasons; (7) drainage investigations and detection of organic pollutants in harmful pollutants of 20 drain pipes, and inspection and detection of organic pollutants in harmful pollutants of six drain pipes; (8) inspections of the PM2.5 emission characteristics of three key industrial pipes; (9) assisting in the analysis of pollutant monitoring during fire disasters in the Meifu warehouse and Carrefour warehouse; (10) amendments to on-site response standard operating procedures for air pollution incidents, maintenance of and updates to the emergency response system for disastrous air pollution incidents, and maintenance of the delivery and review system for emergency response measures in air pollution emergencies, as well as inspections of the system and database; (11) handling environmental education training and regulation training seminars and meetings; (12) correlation analysis of hazardous air pollutant emissions and health risks based on the service proposal plan. In this plan, a total of 37 Dioxin emission sources were investigated. Scientific instruments were used to check the operational parameters of Dioxin emission sources, such as the feeding quantity, incineration equipment operation, pollution prevention, control equipment operation, and sampling of facility conditions, to effectively control the operation status of control equipment in each plant. There were nine stationary pollution sources whose operation status did not meet the operation permit threshold, for which improvements and follow-ups post-improvement are required. The plan reviewed 131 test reports, test plans, and other relevant data declared by Dioxin sources in Taoyuan City, and conducted on-site monitoring of 17 managed Dioxin sources. Three pollution sources were asked to conduct re-sampling due to equipment damage or process failure during the inspection. The inspection and detection of Dioxin discharge sources in eight pipes was carried out, and one boiler using SRF and waste rubber as a fuel did not meet the "Small and Medium-Sized Waste Incinerator Dioxin Control and Emission Standards" – the discharge limit of Dioxin with a designed capacity of 4 metric tons/hour or more. The annual Dioxin emissions of all Dioxin emission sources in 2022 were estimated to be 0.032 g-TEQ/year from large incinerators, 0.013 g-TEQ/year from medium incinerators, 0.042 g-TEQ/year from small incinerators, 1.50 g-TEQ/year from electric arc furnaces, 0.007 g-TEQ/year from auxiliary fuel – waste liquid, 0.408 g-TEQ/year from auxiliary fuel – sludge, 0.069 g-TEQ/year from auxiliary fuel – saw dust, 0.017 g-TEQ/year from auxiliary fuel – coal – water slurry, 0.120 g-TEQ/year from boiler power generation or steam power co-combustion boilers, 0.0007 g-TEQ/year from crematories, 0.180 g-TEQ/year from secondary copper smelting, 0.016 g-TEQ/year from aluminum and other metal secondary smelting, and 0.017 g-TEQ/year from other processing industries. Total emissions in 2022 was 2.423 g-TEQ/year, accounting for about 1/20 of the national Dioxin annual emissions (47.7 g-TEQ/year) in 2020 estimated by the EPA. This plan completed the Dioxin detection and investigation of environmental air at the leeward side of a special industrial area, the Taoyuan City Environmental Science and Technology Park, over nine months, spanning five areas with heavy Dioxin pollution sources – Yong-an Elementary School in Xinwu District, Shu-Lin Elementary School in Guanyin, and Chao-Inn Elementary School in Dajun District across four seasons. The concentrations of Dioxin in the ambient air ranged from 0.014 to 0.792 pg TEQ/Nm3, and the average value was 0.146 pg-TEQ/m3, which is higher than the EPA's monitoring value of 23 air quality stations (the concentration range is N.D.~0.120 pg-TEQ/m3, and the average value is 0.022 pg-TEQ/m3), but lower than the ambient quality base annual average of ambient Dioxin of 0.6 pg-TEQ /Nm3 in Japan. The monitoring results of hazardous air pollutants such as heavy metals and volatile organic compounds in the perimeter air of the Taoyuan Environmental Science and Technology Park met the perimeter standards of the "Stationary Pollution Source Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions Standards", and also complies with the standard values set by the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Commission (EC), the Japanese Ministry of Environment, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and other authorities. Only hydrochloric acid and ammonia were detected in the air, and the monitoring results were all lower than the boundary standard values in the "Standards for Air Pollutant Emissions from Stationary Pollution Sources". This year, boilers using SRF as fuel were investigated. The mass concentration of PM2.5 at the Yangmei Factory of Yuen Foong Yu Consumer Products Co., Ltd. (YFYCPG) was 7.85 mg/Nm3, mainly CPM, the main components being sulfate, sodium ion, and chloride salt; the mass concentration of PM2.5 at P401 of TA-YUAN COGEN CO., LTD. was 20.7 mg/Nm3, mainly CPM, the main components being sulfate, sodium ion, and chloride salt. The urea was sprayed in both factories to reduce nitrogen oxide. As a result, the exhaust gas contained sulfate, ammonium ions, and other compounds, which formed aerosols such as ammonium sulfate in the atmosphere after discharge. The FTIR of Haihu National Primary School detected 10 kinds of pollutants: ammonia gas, cyclohexane, dichloromethane, ethanol, ethyl acetate, isopropyl alcohol, methane, methanol, n-butane, and vinyl chloride. During the monitoring period, the value of ethyl acetate exceeded the perimeter standard and factory threshold. The high value of vinyl chloride appeared from 08:00 to 09:00 on 10 February 2022. The maximum concentration monitored for 5 minutes was ND to 116 ppb, and the average hourly concentration was 17.7 ppb, which did not exceed the perimeter standard of 20 ppb. The air pollution emergency response measures declaration system of controlled factories has been established and is routinely maintained. The factory could fill in or upload all data online directly, following which it translates into a proposed measure for online review, which is convenient for establishing an electronic data file of all manufacturer data. This system can be used to quickly review the air pollution emergency response measure proposal when the EPD adds a new chemical-controlled factory. It selected the Top 100 sources of VOC emissions and stationary pollution sources that use the pipe materials listed in the "Stationary Pollution Source Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions Standards", and conducted an investigation of the organic matter emission status in 20 drain pipes of nine plants, and inspected and detected six drain pipes of six plants. The toluene emission concentration of P205 of the Achem Technology Yangmei Factory No. 2 and the P101, P102 and P103 of the Tong Yang Group Guanyin factory did not conform to the "Stationary Pollution Source Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions Standards". In the future, it will cooperate with Taiman Company to provide guidance on reducing emissions. For the stationary pollution sources whose control equipment is a scrubber or absorption and desorption device, and no risk management plan has been submitted, the inspection and detection of harmful organic pollutants covered six drain pipes thus; all results meet emission standards.
英文關鍵字 Hazardous air pollutants, Dioxin, Fine particulate matters