| 英文摘要 |
This plan implements the environmental nuisance cases acceptance and
inspection manpower efficiency strengthening in Environmental
Protection Bureau, Yunlin County. The contents of appointment include
reception and log in of complaint cases, immediate inspections (including
nighttime and weekends), database set up based on inspection results, and
other administrative matters.
Among 5,796 complaint cases being
processed, 3,388 cases (58.45%), 1,569 cases (27.07%), and 297 cases
(5.12%) were reported by phone calls, Internet, and Email, indicating the
direct line which has been propagated by YLEPA in recent years were
widely used by residents. In addition, the percentage of Internet and
mobile APP has been increasing recently.
According to the classification of pollution sources, 2,216 Environmental
Sanitation cases accounting for 38.23% of total cases were handled,
followed by Odor Nuisance (2,011 cases, 34.70%), Waste (669 cases,
11.54%), Noise (518 cases, 8.94%), and the remaining cases (less than 5%
for each source), indicating odor, environmental sanitation, noise and
waste nuisance cases were the main pollution sources in Yunlin County.
Compared to last few years, the cases of Odor Pollutants and
Environmental Sanitation were found increasing gradually. The more cases
of illegal dumping this year has inevitably increased the analysis costs due
to the requirement to determine if the wastes were hazardous or not.
v
摘要
Based on the classification of petition targets in 2022, public places were
found to be the highest percentage (52.97%) with 3,070 cases, followed
by households (816 cases, 14.08%), factories (600 cases, 10.35%), animal
agriculture/aquaculture areas (502 cases, 8.66%), and others (less than
10%). The statistic results showed that the reports of Environmental
pollutions were not limited to profit-seeking enterprises but various places,
indicating people started to focus on the environment nearby and were able
to report the pollution cases to Environmental Public Nuisance Center
immediately by various means.
During the project implementation, for 120 cases with 582 samples
analyzed (costed 908,300 NT dollars). The cases for air pollutions costed
261,000 NT dollars, accounting for 28.73% of total costs; the cases for
waste/soil contaminations costed 615,000 NT dollars, accounting for
67.71% (highest) of total costs; the cases for water pollutions costed
32,300 NT dollars, accounting for 3.56% (lowest) of total costs. Based on
the analysis of sampling costs, waste/soil contamination cases costs were
higher, while no clearly concentrated months for air and water pollution
cases. The costs was concentrated in April owing to the waste/soil
sampling, causing the higher analysis costs.
|