環境資源報告成果查詢系統

屏東縣-111年屏東縣高屏溪水污染稽查管制暨南區水污染緊急應變及水污費徵收查核計畫

中文摘要 本計畫為屏東縣政府環境保護局針對高屏溪流域之事業進行稽查與輔導,加強執行高屏溪流域稽查工作及放流水水質採樣檢測、暗管稽查與封管等作業之專案計畫,以有效削減高屏溪流域河川污染,並辦理全縣水污染防治費徵收查核作業,督促業者覈實報繳水污染防治費,以及全縣水污染緊急事件之應變作業,以防止、排除或減輕河川及海洋污染,並辦理法規宣導會及協助河川巡守隊業務推廣,建立縣民良好的環保觀念及提升執行力。計畫執行期程為111年1月21日至111年12月31日止,執行工項內容包含為(1)辦理屏東縣高屏溪流域事業巡查作業、(2)水污費徵收查核、(3)執行環保署專案計畫、(4)南區水污染事件緊急應變及(5)其它配合事項等5大工項。今年度執行成果如下: (一) 畜牧業稽查作業 透過多元因子篩選建立重點事業稽查名單,針對610家列管畜牧業累計完成稽巡查874件次(稽查率達100%),並完成122家畜牧業放流採樣136件次,超出放流水標準134件次(本縣為讓業者強化廢水處理設備時間,目前稽查採樣策略為稽查員目視放流水濃度超過3倍之放流水標準得以採樣),不合格率98.5%。本計畫共協助查獲176件次違規情事,其中放流水不符合規定134件,處分2,646,092元;查獲12件繞流違規,處分3,360,200元;違反其他等相關規定30件,處分921,071元,累計處分達6,927,363元。 (二) 污染即時監測查緝作業 今年度架設20家畜牧業(發現疑慮或經常未排放至地面水體)運用水質連續監測設備,查獲15家放流水超標及5家繞流排放,累積裁處 金額1,733,620元 (三)關鍵測站九如橋水質 今年度九如橋測站目標平均RPI降級改善至中度污染,1-11月RPI 平均為6.02,目前為嚴重污染(RPI>6),透過加強稽查期盼12月RPI為中度污染,同時今年度RPI降級至中度污染(RPI=3~6)。 二、水污費徵收查核 (一)事業水污防治費稽查作業 今年度完成405家次稽查作業,110年第2期應徵收繳納1,507家且申報率100%,金額20,684,344元。2家畜牧業逾期未繳費經多次催繳仍未繳費,環保局已依法執行處分,其中順○畜牧場完成繳清罰鍰及水污費。111年第1期應徵收繳納1,484家且申報率100%,金額23,427,711元。其中1家畜牧業逾期未繳費經多次催繳仍未繳費,已執行通知業者,告知應依規定期限完成繳費作業。 (二)水污費申報輔導作業 110年第2期畜牧業徵收總計1,484家且申報率100%,領有正式管編者(1,270家)金額19,611,735元;領有臨時管編者(47家)金額89,586元。事業徵收188家且申報率100%,金額2,631,718元。111年第1期畜牧業徵收總計1,484家且申報率100%,領有正式管編者(1,262家)金額19,611,735元;領有臨時管編者(42家)金額86,850元。事業徵收180家且申報率100%,金額3,729,126元。 (三)環保署針對「110年度第2期水污費申報有疑義廠家」共計54家,本計畫篩選執行32家(11家事業、21家畜牧業)水污費異常查核作業。陳○富畜牧場經查證發現業者未申請沼液沼渣或回收澆灌,亦因業者無法提出畜養頭數,應以最大量追收水污染防治費用。 (四)本計畫協助彙整環保局水污染相關裁處對象,涉及放流水質不符標準140家,提報環保署由環保署最終審查。 三、環保署專案計畫 (一)公共/社區污水下水道系統查核 今年度公共污水下水道累計22次檢測結果皆符合排放標準。社區污水下水道完成13家開機查核(1.巡查鼓風機正常運作、2.巡查消毒池投放藥劑情況及3.核對水、電表數值合理性),並執行3家放流水採樣,其檢測皆符合排放標準。另調查廢水設施8家屬自行操作,其餘5家委外操作並使用環保署公告之定型化契約。 (三)預鑄式建築物污水處理設施查核 今年度查核4處使用預鑄式污水處理設施者,查驗設備正常開機操作、人孔上方空間淨空、每年清理污泥1次,查驗結果皆符合規定。 (四)化糞池污物定期清理 故依據98年12月9日屏府環廢字第09802894061號函,屏東縣以機關、學校為主要公告清理對象共列管310家(學校150家、機關160家)。統計111年1~10月水肥清運,共323車次,清運量達4156.04噸。 四、南區水污染事件緊急應變 今年度本縣未有重大突發水污染事件發生,本計畫協助1場河川水污染事件(萬年溪死魚事件)河道死魚清除,清除約4.5公噸魚屍及河面垃圾,全數運送至崁頂焚化爐處理。 (一)水污染緊急應變教育訓練 本次水巡守隊員共35人參加教育訓練,其教育訓練為說明污染應變設備介紹,水污染事件發生時權責機關如何告知現場處理狀況。 (二)辦理水污染緊急應變器材實作 本次應變器材實作訓練5個單位共13人參與,並邀請坤柏海洋油污處理有限公司陳圍入經理擔任講座。 (三)辦理水污染緊急應變協同演練 本次演練10個單位共55人參與,其演練階段分為七項:階段一、事故發生、通報及河川油污應變;階段二、落海人員救生救難;階段三、成立海洋油污染緊急應變中心;階段四、油污染清理作業;階段五、善後處理;階段六、事件狀況解除;階段七、災因調查污染賠償及求償。 六、其它配合事項 (一)協助辦理法規宣導說明會 本年度共辦理6場次,邀請對象為畜牧業者及事業業者共229人次參與,宣導內容為包含水污染防治相關法規、水污費徵收、生活污水減量、社區污水道相關作業。 (二)屏東縣雲端地圖系統建立 本計畫於雲端地圖建立全縣列管事業、污水下水道系統位置及基本資訊(例如事業名稱、水量、事業類別等)提供同仁及相關水污染防治計畫執行單位操作使用,計畫結束前將轉移系統管理權限予機關人員。 (三)早鳥夜鷹專案 早鳥夜鷹專案旨強化夜間時段稽查量能,防杜不肖業者心存僥倖違規排放廢水污染河川水質。環保局執行早鳥夜鷹專案稽查47場次,共出勤627人次,累積稽查1,059件次,共查獲違反水污法相關案件為79件,裁處金額2,604,467元。
中文關鍵字 水污費徵收查核、辦理屏東縣高屏溪流域事業巡查作業、南區水污染事件緊急應變

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 111 計畫經費 11252 千元
專案開始日期 2022/01/20 專案結束日期 2022/12/31 專案主持人 陳威憲
主辦單位 屏東縣政府環境保護局 承辦人 鄭至琇 執行單位 技佳工程科技股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 期末定稿(系統上傳用).pdf 20MB

2022 Pingtung County Gaoping River Water Pollution Inspection and Control and South Dwastrict Water Pollution Emergency Response and Water Sewage Fee Collection Review Plan

英文摘要 This project was a plan for the Environmental Protection Bureau of Pingtung County Government to conduct inspections and guidance for the enterprwases in the Gaoping River Basin, and to strengthen the implementation of the inspection work in this Basin, the sampling and testing of dwascharged water quality, the inspection and sealing of hidden pipes, etc. in order to effectively reduce river pollution in the Gaoping River Basin, and handle the collection and verification of water pollution prevention and control fees throughout the county, urge business operators to verify and pay water pollution prevention and control fees, and respond to water pollution emergencies in the county, so as to prevent, eliminate or mitigate pollution of rivers and oceans, as well as conducting law and regulation publicity meetings and asswasting the river patrol team in business promotion, so as to establwash a good environmental protection concept of county residents and improve execution. The implementation period of the plan was from January 21, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The implementation of the project includes (1) handling the inspection of the Gaoping River Basin in Pingtung County, (2) the collection and inspection of water sewage fees, (3) Execute the EPA project plan, (4) emergency response to the water pollution incident in the southern dwastrict, and (5) other coordination matters. This year's implementation results were as follows: 1. Inspection Operation in Gaoping River Basin Busineses of Pingtung County (1) Inspection of animal husbandry Establwashed a lwast of key business inspections through multi-factor screening, completed a total of 874 inspections of 610 managed animal husbandry (the inspection rate reached 100%), and completed 136 samples of 122 animal husbandry releases. Among them, 134 cases exceeded the release water standard (in order to allow the industry to strengthen the time for wastewater treatment equipment, the current inspection and sampling strategy was that the inspector vwasually releases water whose concentration exceeds 3 times the dwascharge standard as sample), with a failure rate of 98.5%. This project asswasted in the detection of 176 violations, including 134 violations of dwascharge water violations, and a penalty of NT$2,646,092; 12 violations of bypassing regulations were seized, and a penalty of NT$3,360,200; 30 violations of other relevant regulations, a penalty of NT$921,071. The accumulated punwashment amounted to NT$6,927,363. (2) Pollution real-time monitoring and investigation operations This year, 20 animal husbandry companies (found doubts or often not dwascharged to surface water bodies) were set up to use continuous water quality monitoring equipment, and 15 companies were found to dwascharge water exceeding the standard and 5 companies to bypass the flow. The cumulative amount of sanctions was NT$1,733,620. (3) Water quality of key measuring station Jiuruqiao This year, the average RPI of the Jiuruqiao Measuring Station was downgraded to moderate pollution. The average RPI from January to November was 6.02. It was currently seriously polluted (RPI>6). Through strengthening inspections, it was expected that the RPI will be moderately polluted in December. Meanwhile, this year's RPI has been downgraded to moderate pollution (RPI=3~6). 2. Collection and verification of water pollution charges (1) Inspection operation of enterprwase water pollution prevention and control fees。 This year, 405 inspections have been completed. In the second phase of 2021, 1,507 companies should be collected and paid, and the declaration rate was 100%, with an amount of NT$20,684,344. 2 animal husbandry failed to pay the fee after the due date, and the Environmental Protection Bureau has enforced the punwashment in accordance with the law. Among them, the Shun○ Livestock Farm has paid off the fine and water pollution fee. In the first phase of 2022, 1,484 companies should collect and pay, and the declaration rate was 100%, with an amount of NT$23,427,711. Among them, one animal husbandry company failed to pay the fee after the due date and still failed to pay the fee after repeated reminders. The operator has been notified that the payment should be completed within the prescribed time limit. (2) Guidance on declaration of water pollution fee The second phase of animal husbandry expropriation in 2021 has a total of 1,484 companies and the declaration rate was 100%. Those who have formal management (1,270 companies) have an amount of NT$19,611,735; those who have temporary management (47 companies) have an amount of NT$89,586. There were 188 business enterprwases and the declaration rate was 100%, NT$2,631,718. The first phase of animal husbandry expropriation in 2022 totaled 1,484 and the declaration rate was 100%. Those with official management (1,262) received NT$19,611,735; those with temporary management (42) received NT$86,850. There were 180 business enterprwases and the declaration rate was 100%, and the amount was NT$3,729,126. (3) The Environmental Protection Agency targets a total of 54 "manufacturers with doubts in the declaration of the second phase of water pollution fees in 2021", and this plan screened and implemented 32 companies (11 enterprwases, 21 animal husbandry) to check abnormal water pollution fees. Chen ○ Fu Livestock Farm had been verified and found that the owner had not applied for biogas slurry or residue or recycling watering, and because the owner cannot provided the number of livestock, the water pollution prevention and control fee should be charged at the maximum amount. (4) This plan asswasts in the collection of water pollution-related sanctions by the Environmental Protection Bureau, involving 140 companies whose dwascharge water quality does not meet the standards, and was submitted to the Environmental Protection Adminwastration for final review. 3. Environmental Protection Adminwastration project plan (1) Inspection of public/community sewage and sewer systems This year, a total of 22 test results of public sewage sewers met the dwascharge standards. The community sewage sewer has completed 13 start-up inspections (1. inspecting the normal operation of the blower, 2. inspecting the injection of chemicals in the dwasinfection tank, and 3. checking the rationality of the water and electricity meter values), and carried out 3 sewage samples, all of which meet the dwascharge standards. In addition, the 8 waste water facilities under investigation were all self-operated, and the remaining 5 were outsourced and use the finalized contract announced by the Environmental Protection Agency. (2) Management of special sewage and sewer systems in industrial areas This year, sampling of runoff water from 2 industrial areas in Gaopingxi was carried out every month, and a total of 32 samplings were taken (14 during the day, 9 at night, 2 during holidays and 7 during rainwater). The test results all met the dwascharge standards. (3) Examination of waste water treatment facilities for prefabricated building This year, we inspected 4 places that use the prefabricated building sewage treatment facilities. We checked that the equipment was running normally, the space above the manhole was clear, and the sludge was cleaned once a year. The inspection results were all in compliance with the regulations. (4) Regular cleaning of septic tank waste Therefore, according to the Ping-Fu Huan-Fei-Zi No. 09802894061 letter dated December 9, 2009, Pingtung County took government agencies and schools as the main announcement and clean-up targets for a total of 310 (150 schools, 160 government agencies). According to statwastics, water and fertilizer were cleared and transported from January to October in 2022, a total of 323 trips, and the clearing volume reached 4156.04 tons 4. Emergency response to water pollution incidents in the southern dwastrict This year, there was no major water pollution incident in this county. This plan asswasted in one river water pollution incident (Wannian River dead fwash incident) to remove dead fwash from the river, and removed about 4.5 tons of fish carcasses and river garbage, and transported them all to Kanding incinerator dwasposal. (1) Water pollution emergency response education and training A total of 35 members of the water patrol team participated in the education and training. The education and training were to explain the introduction of pollution response equipment and how to inform the responsible authorities of the on-site handling status when a water pollution incident occurs. (2) Handle the implementation of water pollution emergency response equipment A total of 13 people from 5 units participated in the strain equipment practical training, and the manager of Kunbai Marine Oil Pollution Treatment Co., Ltd. Chen Wei) was invited to give a lecture. (3) Coordinated water pollution emergency response drills A total of 55 people from 10 units participated in the drill, and the drill stage was divided into seven phases: Phase 1, accident occurrence, notification and response to river oil pollution; Phase 2, rescue of those who fell into the sea; Phase 3, establwashment of an emergency response center for marine oil pollution ; Phase 4, oil pollution clean-up operations; Phase 5, aftermath treatment; Phase 6, event status release; Phase 7, dwasaster investigation pollution compensation and claims. 6. Other cooperation matters (1) Asswast in the handling of legal publicity briefings This year, a total of 6 sessions were held, inviting 229 people from animal husbandry and business operators to participate. The publicity content included relevant laws and regulations on water pollution prevention, collection of water pollution fees, reduction of domestic sewage, and related operations of community sewers. (2) Pingtung County Cloud Map System Establwashment This plan establwashes the location and basic information (such as business name, water volume, business category, etc.) of the county's lwasted management enterprwases and sewage and sewer systems on the cloud map for colleagues and related water pollution prevention and control plan implementation units to operate and use. Before the end of the plan, it will transfer system management authority to agency personnel. (3) Early Bird Nighthawk Project The Early Bird Nighthawk Project aims to strengthen the audit capacity during the night time to prevent unscrupulous operators from dwascharging waste water and polluting river water quality. The Environmental Protection Agency carried out 47 early-bird and nighthawk inspections, with a total of 627 people on duty, and a total of 1,059 inspections. A total of 79 cases related to violations of the Water Pollution Act were seized, and the amount of fines was NT$2,604,467.\
英文關鍵字 handling the inspection of the Gaoping River Basin in Pingtung County, emergency response to the water pollution incident in the southern dwastrict