環境資源報告成果查詢系統

111年度澎湖縣空氣品質管理發展計畫

中文摘要 澎湖縣為我國離島縣位於臺灣海峽上,由澎湖群島所組成,人口有六成定居於馬公市,澎湖縣內轄有1市5鄉共有6個鄉市,早期經濟活動以漁業為主,隨著漁業資源比重降低,現已轉型為以觀光為主。 澎湖縣每年夏季的花火節與水上活動帶來人潮,觀光遊客透過航空或輪船前來旅遊,108年旅遊人次達最高峰1,286千人次,109年及110年受疫情影響分別降為1,143千人及618千人,111年統計至10月為1,070千人次,疫情趨緩旅運回升。 澎湖縣設有環保署馬公站監測各項污染物空氣品質,AQI>100占比,由107年8.5%降至110年3.0%,111年統計至11月為5.7%。歷年最大指標污染物O3_8hr主要分布於3~5月及9~11月,PM2.5在107~110年主要分布於1、2月,而111年1~11月超標日中,指標污染物則尚無PM2.5。 馬公站105至111年11月同期PM2.5平均濃度,自動站與手動站均呈逐年下降趨勢,PM2.5手動站108~110年三年平均值低於年平均值及24hr_ 98%高值之空品標準15µg/m3及35µg/m3,已改善至二級防制區。O3_8hr_93%高值濃度107~109三年平均為70.5ppb,高於空品標準60ppb,其自110年起為三級防制區,111年相較108~110年受境外污染影響延時長及移入濃度更高之交互影響,導致O3-8hr濃度偏高,為唯一尚未達111年度污防書目標之污染物。 環保署111年公告修正排放清冊TEDS11.1,與前版TEDS10.1進行各類污染源排放量變化比較,PM10及PM2.5以裸露地表占比最高(62.6%及57.8%);SOx及NOx以電力業占比最高(49.3%及41.0%);NMHC以一般消費占比42.1%最高。 澎湖縣111年空氣污染防制計畫書有9項管制策略,截至11月底各項皆已達量化目標;其中有3項具減量效益的策略,截至11月底相對於基準年年削減量目標PM10,PM2.5,NOx,NMHC達成率皆已達100%。 本年度4月及10月召開二次「空氣污染防制計畫追蹤檢討會議」,邀請3名專家委員與會諮詢建議,除針對空品目標及既有9項管制策略目標之達成情形檢討,並針對下一版空氣污染防制計畫研商管制策略修訂,包括研擬新增3項管制策略及調整3項既有策略。另召開「空氣污染減量跨局處協調暨室內空氣品質管理與健康影響說明會議」,促使各局處共同協助推動管制措施,併同宣導各主管機關強化室內空氣品質管制教育。 本團隊建立澎湖縣空氣品質維護/改善督導查核標準作業程序,檢核各子計畫月報/季報/半年度等資料。依據考評指標彙整量化執行成果,已完成第四季(11月底)自評分數並召開2場工作會議及6場子計畫工作檢討會議,提升整體執行成效。另辦理一場次專家學者考評各子計畫現場執行成效查核,並由本計畫於後續每月子計畫現場查核時追蹤改善情形。 111年截至11月啟動空氣品質不良應變總計6次,均已落實子計畫通報查處作業,並按時回報署網站。為強化本縣空氣品質惡化狀況發生時之應變能力,6月跨局處召開「空氣品質惡化緊急應變教育訓練暨空氣品質管理與健康影響說明會」,針對修訂法規及應變作業要點解說,並於9月底完成辦理1場次「空氣品質嚴重惡化緊急應變兵棋推演」。 空品淨化區執行成果,聯合縣府相關局處推展環境綠美化,減少裸露地風蝕揚塵排放,每人享有青青草園面積由99年8.85m2/人上升至111 年11月12.52 m2/人;今年推動計有7處空氣品質淨化區由民間企業認養及志工認養(相較去年新增3處,增加75%),並聘請專家委員至空品淨化區自評考核。另辦理1場次清淨空氣綠牆設置推廣說明會,並針對有意願設置綠牆之校園進行現勘及協助設置規劃,後續有5間提出申請並通過補助審核,成功輔導設置數量為去年之5倍。
中文關鍵字 空氣品質、管理發展、管制對策、空氣品質淨化區、污染排放源

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 111 計畫經費 3600 千元
專案開始日期 2022/01/21 專案結束日期 2022/12/31 專案主持人 潘一誠
主辦單位 澎湖縣政府環境保護局 承辦人 黃紫羿 執行單位 鼎環工程顧問股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 111年度澎湖縣空氣品質管理發展計畫-期末報告(公開).pdf 16MB

111 Penghu County Air Quality Management and Development Plan

英文摘要 Penghu County is an outlying island county located on Taiwan Strait, and is composed of several Islands. There are 1 city and 5 townships in Penghu County, and 60% of the population lives in Magong City. The early economic activities were mainly fisheries. With the reduction of the fishery resources, it has been transformed into tourism county so far. The Fireworks Festival and water sports in Penghu County every summer bring tourists, coming to travel by plane or ship. The number of tourists in 2018 reached a peak of 1,286 thousand people. In 2020 and 2021, affected by the COVID-19 epidemic, the number of tourists dropped to 1,143 thousand and 618 thousand respectively. According to the statistics of October 2022 of 1,070 thousand people, the epidemic slowed down and tourists rebounded. Penghu County has an air quality monitor station in Magong of the Environmental Protection Agency to monitor the air quality of various pollutants. The proportion of AQI > 100 has dropped from 8.5% in 2018 to 3.0% in 2021, and 5.7% in November 2022. The largest index pollutant O3_8hr over the years is mainly distributed in March-May and September-November, PM2.5 is mainly distributed in January and February in 107-110 years, and there are no PM2.5 as the index pollutants in 2022 yet. The average concentration of PM2.5 from 2016 to 2022 at Magong Station, both the automatic statistics and the manual statistics showed a downward trend year by year, and turn Penghu County to Class 2 control regions. As for O3_8hr, Penghu County does not meet air quality standards and still remains in Class 3 control regions from 2021. Compared with 2019~2020, it was affected by the interaction of longer days and higher concentration of overseas pollution migration in 2022, resulting in higher concentration of O3-8hr, which is the only pollutant that has not yet met the the air pollution control scheme target of 2022. The Environmental Protection Agency announced in 2022 that it revised the emission inventory TEDS11.1. Compared with the previous version of TEDS10.1, the changes in emissions from various pollution sources were compared, including PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx and NMHC. Penghu County air pollution control scheme has 9 control strategies, all of which have reached their quantitative targets by the end of November; among them, there are 3 strategies with reduction benefits, and all pollutants reduction achievement rates have all reached 100%. In April and October of this year, two "Air Pollution Control Scheme Tracking and Review Meetings" were held, and three scholars were invited to attend the meeting for consultation and suggestions. 3 new control strategies were drawn up and the 3 existing strategies were adjusted. In addition, the "Air Pollution Reduction Inter-Bureau Coordination and Indoor Air Quality Management and Health Impact Explanation Meeting" was held to urge all bureaus to assist in control measures, and to promote the importance of indoor air quality. This project establishes the inspection procedures for each project and checks the statistics submitted by each project, and hold relative review meetings to improve the overall execution effectiveness. In addition, this project invited scholars to evaluate the on-site implementation effectiveness of each project, and tracked the results in the following month. As of November 2022, emergency response measures for poor air quality have been adopted 6 times, all of which have notified each project and reported to the agency website on time. In order to strengthen the county's ability to respond when the air quality deteriorates, the "Air Quality Deterioration Emergency Response Education Training and Air Quality Management and Health Impact Explanation Session" was held in June to explain the revision of regulations and the main points of response operations. At the end of September, "Emergency Practice for Severe Deterioration of Air Quality Meeting" was held. This project cooperated with the relevant bureaus of the county government to promote environmental greening and beautification, reduce the emission of dust from wind erosion on bare land, and increased the green area from 8.85m2/person in 2010 to 12.52 m2/person in November 2022. This year, 7 air quality purification areas were promoted to be adopted by private enterprises and volunteers, and experts were invited to self-evaluate the air purification areas. A promotion meeting on the installation of green walls was held, and setting up planning were carried out for campuses that were willing to set up green walls. Subsequently, 5 schools submitted applications, and the number of installations was 5 times that of last year.
英文關鍵字 Air Quality, Management and Development, Control Strategy, Air quality purification area, Pollution Source