環境資源報告成果查詢系統

112-113年毒物及化學物質管理基金徵收分析評估計畫

中文摘要 基於預防原則及籌措因擴大管理化學物質之經費來源,民國108年1月16日修正通過之《毒性及關注化學物質管理法》(以下簡稱毒管法)增列化學物質運作費及成立基金之徵收目的、對象、用途等事項(修正條文第47條及第48條),此外,訂定基金應成立基金管理會(以下簡稱管理會)負責管理及運用(修正條文第49條)。環境部化學物質管理署(簡稱化學署)於民國111年前期計畫就化學署規劃之基金課費費率,對國內運作人可能造成之總體及個體經濟影響,以及主要化學物質清單,進行分析評估。 然而,考量到近年全球爆發COVID-19疫情,全球供應鏈乃至化學物質之運作,產生巨大變化,因此,本期計畫就疫情後變化,進一步評估對整體產業及個別化學物質運作人的影響,作為後續政策執行之參考。本計畫目前執行成果分述如下: 一、物價波動評估 (一)收費集中:收費前20大化學物質皆為寡占市場(市場運作量高度集中在2〜4家運作人),甚至是獨大(市場運作量高度集中在1家運作人);亦為較容易發生成本轉嫁價格的條件因素。 (二)收費漲幅遠低於市價波動:苯、氯乙烯、1,2-二氯乙烷、異丙苯、甲基第三丁基醚、環氧乙烷、1,3-丁二烯、丙烯腈、醋酸乙烯酯、甲醛、鄰苯二甲酐、環氧氯丙烷等物質,其收費漲價幅度約0.01%~0.50%(以100%轉嫁為例),相較於近年市價波動度,10年均價波動(103-112年)約17%~75%,3年均價波動(110-112年)約3%~82%,漲價幅度遠小於物質的市價波動幅度。 二、收費衝擊評估 (一)繳費對營收占比評估方面,目前各費率方案對前20大繳費業者之營收衝擊皆未達1%。 (二)主要繳費業者近三年經營績效普遍惡化,該些業者也為碳費繳費大戶,新增碳費可預期對業者財務影響重大,連帶課徵化學物質運作費也遭受影響。 三、基金收費在消費者物價(CPI)影響方面 (一)化學物質運作費收費項目皆為工業原料或工業中間財,因此在價格波動方面直接影響的是「生產者物價指數(PPI)」,對CPI無直接影響。 (二)化學物質運作費收費物質若非出口,便多是國內製造者自產自用,因此對CPI相關民生消費商品價格影響更不明顯,估計低於化學物質運作費收費前20大項目市場價格受影響的幅度(0.01%〜0.5%)。
中文關鍵字 化學基金、化學物質管理、投入產出分析

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 112 計畫經費 1412 千元
專案開始日期 2023/12/15 專案結束日期 2024/10/31 專案主持人 李盈嬌
主辦單位 化學署綜合規劃組 承辦人 劉華林 執行單位 財團法人中華經濟研究院

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 化學基金成果報告.pdf 5MB 化學基金成果報告

Analysis and Evaluation Project for the Collection of the Toxic and Chemical Substances Management Fund (2023-2024)

英文摘要 To uphold the precautionary principle and secure funding for the expanded management of chemical substances, the " Toxic and Concerned Chemical Substances Control Act" (hereafter referred to as the Act) was amended on January 16, 2019. This amendment introduced the purpose, scope, and usage for collecting fees related to chemical substance operations and established a fund (amended Articles 47 and 48). Additionally, it stipulated that a Fund Management Committee (hereafter referred to as the Committee) be created to oversee the management and utilization of the fund (amended Article 49). In a prior phase of the project (2022), the Chemicals Administration (CHA) within the Ministry of Environment conducted an analysis and assessment of the overall and individual economic impact on domestic operators, as well as a primary chemical substance list, based on the proposed fee rates for the fund. Considering the significant changes in global supply chains and chemical operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this phase of the project evaluates the post-pandemic impacts on the overall industry and individual operators of chemical substances as a reference for future policy implementation. The project outcomes are summarized as follows: 1. Price Fluctuation Assessment o Concentrated Revenue Collection: The top 20 chemical substances by revenue are all in oligopolistic markets (with operation volumes highly concentrated among 2–4 operators) or even monopolistic markets (with operation volumes dominated by a single operator). These market conditions also create favorable factors for cost pass-through pricing. o Fee Increase Significantly Lower than Market Price Volatility: For substances like benzene, vinyl chloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, isopropylbenzene, MTBE, ethylene oxide, 1,3-butadiene, acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, formaldehyde, phthalic anhydride, and epichlorohydrin, the fee increase is about 0.01% to 0.50% (assuming full cost pass-through), much lower than recent market price fluctuations—annual average price fluctuations of 17%-75% over the past decade (2014-2023) and 3%-82% over the past three years (2021-2023). 2. Fee Impact Assessment o Revenue Impact Assessment: The fee schemes currently in place impact the revenue of the top 20 fee-paying companies by less than 1%, though this may not fully capture the cost burden effect of environmental fees on these companies. o Deterioration in Business Performance: The primary fee-payers have generally seen a decline in operating performance over the past three years and are also significant contributors to carbon fees, suggesting that the additional chemical operations fee may impact their finances further. 3. Consumer Price Index (CPI) Impact o Limited Impact on CPI: All fee items for chemical substance operations pertain to industrial raw materials or intermediate goods, impacting the Producer Price Index (PPI) directly rather than the CPI. o Minimal Effect on Consumer Goods Prices: As these substances are primarily used domestically or self-produced by manufacturers, the impact on CPI-relevant consumer goods is minimal, estimated at less than the market price effect for the top 20 fee items (0.01%-0.5%).
英文關鍵字 Chemical fund, chemical substance management, input-output analysis (IO)