環境資源報告成果查詢系統

河川水質自動監測評析

中文摘要 本計畫主要針對台灣地區五條河段進行河川水質之短期密集自動監測,同時與人工採樣監測結果進行比對分析,以評估自動監測儀器應用於河川水質監測的適用性,並依計畫實測結果建立河川水質短期密集自動監測作業之標準作業程序,以提供河川水質自動監測未來發展之參考。 由本計畫五條河川上、下游十個監測站各連續14天的監測作業中可發現,河川水質自動監測採樣系統在使用投置式以及陸上型抽水式時,因受到電極包覆及揚程因素影響,執行困難性較高,而以沈水型抽水式之自動採樣監測系統適用性較佳。在儀器部分,則由蒐集之資料顯示,目前國外實例中,多未對儀器廠牌型號進行規範,而各廠牌儀器在偵測範圍、精密度、解析度等規格特性上則均十分相近。在資料傳輸系統部分,則由本計畫結果顯示使用無線傳輸為一確實可行之方式。 另由本計畫在各測項之監測結果以及與人工採樣分析之比對結果顯示,各水質項目中以pH、導電度、水位及水溫等四測項測值穩定度較高,比對結果也較佳,適用性良好;溶氧及濁度則在誤差偏移及跳動性上有較高之情形,適用性尚可;至於在氨氮及硝酸鹽氮兩測項,則因儀器穩定性不佳,且與人工採樣比對結果不甚理想,適用性上較不如預期之良好,建議未來可放棄電極法之測試,而以線上流動注入分析的方式來進行營養鹽測項之測定。
中文關鍵字 河川水質自動監測、精密度、無線傳輸、電極法

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-92-G103-02-218 經費年度 092 計畫經費 2970 千元
專案開始日期 2003/07/01 專案結束日期 2003/12/31 專案主持人 余建中
主辦單位 監資處 承辦人 執行單位 精湛環境股分有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 0000063259.zip 44MB [期末報告]公開完整版

The Evaluating and Analyzing of River Water-Quality Automated Monitoring Project.

英文摘要 The objective of this project is to apply the short-term automated water-quality monitoring on five different streams in Taiwan. In order to evaluate the monitoring Instrument, comparing and analyzing the continuous water-quality monitoring data with manual samplings’ are necessary during the project process. Besides, draft ” The short-term automated water quality monitoring standard operation procedure” based on the project experiences and results. According to project results, it is obvious that the direct emerging and ground pumping systems are not suitable for the continuous water-quality monitoring because of the electrode coating and pumping head problems. The better system should be the emerged pumping system. In the automated monitoring instrument aspect, most countries did not set up or regulate the specific brand and type, and most of the instrument detecting range, resolution, and accuracy for different manufacturers are close to each other. For the water-quality data transmission part, it shows the GPRS wireless transmission is the appropriate method referring to the project result. After the project has been processed, it is clear that pH, specific conductance, temperature, and water level meters’ readings have less differences comparing to manual samplings’. On the contrary, the Turbidity meter is serious affected by the substance within the stream flow thus becomes unstable. As a result, the gap between its data and manual sampling data becomes huge. For the DO property, the DO meter is affected by the speed river flow and has the same condition as the Turbidity meter. Therefore, the comparing results of these two instruments are not so well. Unfortunately, the NH3-N and NO3-N meters are not stable while they are used under continuous water monitoring condition. The comparing results are bad, too. These two meters may not suitable for the project objective. In the future, suggest putting away the testing of electric ion method and using the FIA (Flow Injection Analyzer) to measure and monitor the nutrient subjects in the stream or river.
英文關鍵字 Automated Water-Quality Monitoring、Accuracy