九十二年高雄地區登革熱病媒蚊密度監測及民眾相關認知、態度、行為之調查
| 中文摘要 | 為瞭解登革熱病媒蚊密度及民眾相關之知識、態度及行為，進行本研究，自民國92年3月至11月進行病媒蚊密度監測，結果顯示病媒蚊密度誘蚊產卵指數自3月(35.4%)開始上升至5月(66.4%)，到6月(59.3%)、7月(50.4%)，自8月(69.2%)又上升，至11月高達80.3%。於民國92年7月進行公共場所誘蚊產卵指數監測，空地 (76.3%)、空屋 (72.3%)、公園 (68.1%)都顯著高於市場 (31.7%)。家屋方面，空地附近家屋之誘蚊產卵指數(47.4%)顯著高於其他公共場所附近家屋；室外誘蚊產卵指數 (47.7%)顯著高於室內(29.6%) (P<0.05) 。公共場所誘蚊產卵指數(62.1%)顯著高於家屋誘蚊產卵指數(38.6%) (P<0.05)。另於民國92年7-9月間在高雄縣市進行民眾相關問卷調查。民眾對登革熱病媒蚊認知之問卷調查結果，多數人誤認為登革熱病媒蚊最常於晚上叮咬人(66.5%)；態度及行為方面，多數人對登革熱有警覺性，願意清除登革熱病媒孳生源(87.4%)，但僅有47.5%的民眾能做到「清除孳生源」，應加強民眾防護措施及確實清除孳生源。將受訪民眾分為民國91年病例主要分布地區民眾和病例周圍地區民眾進行分析，病例主要分布地區民眾對登革熱病媒蚊生態習性的認知及態度顯著低於病例周圍地區民眾，故病例地區民眾應加強該相關之知識及態度之衛教。再將受訪民眾分為公園、市場、空地、空屋附近民眾進行分析，結果發現空屋附近居民對登革熱相關之知識、態度、行為，均較其他地區好，而誘蚊產卵指數是四區中最低者(28.6%)，可見有正確的登革熱相關知識、態度及行為，確實其登革熱病媒蚊密度較低(P<0.05)。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 登革熱, 病媒, 監測 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-92-J101-02-205 | 經費年度 | 092 | 計畫經費 | 920 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2003/04/01 | 專案結束日期 | 2003/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 白秀華 |
| 主辦單位 | 環管處 | 承辦人 | 執行單位 | 高雄醫學大學 公共衛生學科 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | 0000069556.pdf | 2MB | [期末報告]公開完整版 |
surveillance on dengue vectors and its correlation with knowledge, attitude and practice of residents in kaohsiung areas.
| 英文摘要 | The ovitrap indices of dengue vectors in Kaohsiung Area had a significant variation throughout the year. This index increased from 35.4% in March to 66.4% in May and reduced to 50.4% in July. However, this index became 69.2% in August and then elevated to 80.3% in November. This study was designed to determine relation between the ovitrap index of dengue vectors and the dengue-related knowledge, attitude, and practice of residents in Kaohsiung Area. The study was conducted from July to September 2003. The ovitrap indices in open spaces (76.3%), antiquated house (72.3%), and parks (68.1%) were significantly higher than that in markets (31.7%). The index of the households near open spaces (47.4%) was significantly higher than those of the remaining groups. The outdoor index (47.4%) was significantly higher than that indoor (29.6%) (P < 0.05). Public places (62.1%) had a significantly higher index than the households (38.6%) (P < 0.05). Among the residents surveyed, 66.5% considered that mosquito bites only occur at night. Most of them (87.4%) agreed to destroy the breeding sites of mosquitoes as an effective preventive measure. However, only 47.5% frequently clean their living environment. People living in the epidemic sectors had less dengue-related knowledge and proper attitude toward the elimination of dengue vectors than those around the epidemic sectors. Therefore, education programs should stress on the relation between dengue prevention and clearance of vector breeding sites, especially in those living in the epidemic sectors. Moreover, knowledge, attitude, and practice related to dengue among residents living near antiquated houses was better than those living near the open spaces, parks, and markets. The index obtained in this group was also significantly lower than those of the remaining groups (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that proper knowledge, attitude, and practice of the population are critical factors for the reduction of dengue vector index. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | dengue, vectors, surveillance | ||