| 英文摘要 |
In Taoyuan County’s many control work sought in air pollution prevention and control implementation for 2005, the nature of the subprojects and that many are independent from each other has hindered the effects to be achieved in vertical coordination. There is a necessity to instill an air pollution surcharge subproject implementation procedure through an integrated air pollution prevention and control plan to assist the environmental protection bureau in spearheading and monitoring the progress and quality of various control world, and to achieve vertical and lateral communication, follow up and coordinate the implementation yield and correlation among the many subprojects through staging a variety of meetings.
It is a necessity to routinely review and adjust the control strategy, which calls for updating the audit for air quality analysis and emission volume in the county by developing a county air quality objective and control strategy. In TSP , traffic permeating dust, transportation vehicles and industry are the main source of pollution; in SOX and NOX, industry discharge has taken up the bulk; in NMHC, transportation vehicles and the use industrial solvent have dominated the discharge. In response to the focus of future control, given that ozone has been a pollutant conveyed in a large area, an air quality model simulation analysis found that in a May 2003 case, the county’s ozone readings are most susceptible to the pollution source found in Taipei County while the impact of the pollution source in Taoyuan County alone was recorded at around 17% to 41%. Furthermore, the contribution of VOCS concentration was found higher than that of NOX. All of which indicate that in order to effectively curtail the ozone concentration, there is also a necessary to stage plenary cross-county and – municipality collaboration meetings in the northern air quality control region by stepping up the joint audit and control in nearby counties and municipalities in order to achieve ominous results.
This plan has also had an integrated 2005 air pollution prevention plan compiled. Moreover, the county’s specific local pollution source has been identified by drafting a specific pollution source improvement , and public service performance objective. The assessment of the overall control strategy rests on evaluating the required funding and technical feasibility in compliance with the existing bulk reduction stipulations set by the Environmental Protection Administration, and on distinguishing the work into three major segments of fixed pollution source control, mobile pollution source control and permeating source control. Which are sought in anticipation of fully utilizing the Environmental Protection Bureau’s existing funding to promote a host of relevant control subprojects to achieve optimal management efficiency and the objectives of bulk reduction and air quality improvement.
|