「提昇廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收處理成效暨回收清除處理成本調查專案工作計畫」
| 中文摘要 | 本計畫執行期程為97年1月28日至12月31日，主要工作內容為調查國內外廢乾電池及廢照明光源（非直管）處理技術及管理制度並研擬管制措施、辦理廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收宣導工作、調查廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收清除處理費及補貼費的各項相關費率因子審議評估以及辦理市售乾電池及各類公告應回收之照明光源重金屬含量檢驗。已完成蒐集國內外廢乾電池及廢照明光源回收管理制度與法令，並依所蒐集資料分別就其管理法規、回收處理現況等5項進行探討。此外，並針對各國之廢乾電池及廢照明光源處理技術分別敘述說明。本年度參與廢乾電池回收工作之責任業者為美商勁量公司，業者已於南區大型社區宣導說明會中設攤進行回收宣導，並規劃宣導回收教育看板（海報）及製作小型廢乾電池回收筒發送予民眾。另分別辦理2場大型社區回收宣導說明會及於北、中、南、東辦理4場社區種子人員回收宣導會。說明會辦理方式主要結合社區種子義工、轄區地方環保機關，責任業者及處理業者以經驗交流與現場觀摩模式進行宣導。依據廢乾電池回收清除處理成本估算結果，98年回收清除處理費率建議值考慮信託基金餘絀修正原則，如錳鋅/筒型鹼錳電池為33.28元/公斤、筒型一次鋰電池為105.62元/公斤。本次抽驗之100組乾電池樣品重金屬鎘及鉛含量均低於規範標準。而照明光源樣品檢驗結果，除環型省電燈管照明光源樣品之汞含量檢驗值高達255 µg/g，其餘9組樣品汞含量檢驗值皆介於20.9～65.1 µg/g之間。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 回收管理制度, 處理技術規範, 回收成效指標, 輔導評估, 責任業者, 回收清除處理成本, 分級補貼費率 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-97-HA14-03-A031 | 經費年度 | 097 | 計畫經費 | 5000 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2008/01/28 | 專案結束日期 | 2008/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 陳宇揚 |
| 主辦單位 | 回收基管會 | 承辦人 | 劉秋菊 | 執行單位 | 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | EPA97HA1403A031.pdf | 25MB | [期末報告]公開完整版 |
Raising the Collection and Recycling Efficiency and Investigating the Collection and Recycling Costs for Waste Batteries and Waste Lamps
| 英文摘要 | The project period was from Jan 28 2008 to Dec 31 2008. The tasks were as follows: collection of the foreign and domestic information about the waste batteries and waste lamps (including non-tube) recycling technologies and management systems and draft the retrain strategy, planning and carrying out the public campaigns and activities for promoting waste batteries and waste lamps collection, investigation and evaluation of the influences for collection and recycling levies and subsidies of waste batteries and waste lamps, sampling and testing for the heavy metal contents within the batteries and lamps (on due) in the market. The collections of the foreign and domestic data of waste batteries and waste lamps collection management systems and regulations had been completed. According to the data, 5 topics were analyzed including management regulations, collection and recycling conditions, etc. Besides, the foreign recycling technologies of waste batteries and waste lamps were described then compared those with domestic technologies. The scheme of promoting the battery producer/importer for joining the battery collection activities had been finished. The participated company was Schick Taiwan Limited An Energizer Company. The company already participated in the southern Taiwan community collection activity by setting the education booth during the activity. The company also designed the poster for promoting collection and produced mini waste battery collection boxes for sending to household. Besides, 2 large-scale community collection councils were hold up successfully, and 4 community collection councils were hold up in the north region, mid region, south region, and east region. The collection councils’ purposes were combining the community volunteers and local environmental authorities, building up the model of collection and recycling activities by exchanging the experiences and learning on site. Referring to the results of waste batteries collection and recycling costs, the 2009 suggested proposed levies considering the collection fund revision for Mn-Zn alkaline battery is 33.28 NT dollars/kg and for primary Li battery is 105.62 NT dollars/kg. According to the test results of the sampling batteries, all 100 samples’ Cd and Lead quantity contents were complied with the regulation standard. According to the test results of the sampling lamps, the circular fluorescent lamp’s Hg quantity content was 255 µg/g, other 9 samples’ test results were between 20.9 to 65.1 µg/g. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | collection management system, recycling technical regulation, collection efficiency index, consulting and evaluation, Producer/Importer, collection and recycling costs, classified subsidy rate. | ||