環境資源報告成果查詢系統

97年度固定污染源管制與查核計畫

中文摘要 本計畫執行期程係自97.4.12至98.3.31止,共計12個月分為十六大重點包括:1.執行六輕以外一般性巡查至少完成70家次。2.執行六輕以外公私場所排放量清查及更新至少70家次。3.分級執行六輕以外公私場所法規符合度查核至少70家次。4.執行六輕以外許可案件之審查、核發與建檔。5.執行「固定污染源空氣污染管理資訊系統」列管公私場所資料庫之擴充、更新及維護管理。6.辦理固定污染源空氣污染防制費申報收件、審核、鍵檔及催補繳作業。7. 執行公私場所各項稽查檢測作業。8.除六輕工業園區以外,依法應符合戴奧辛管制及排放標準之固定污染源,至少各查核1次。9.本縣固定污染源自動連線監測系統管理。10.空氣污染物年排放量網路申報系統管理。11.固定污染源定檢申報系統之管理及審核作業。12. 配合本縣空氣品質惡化或重大空氣污染事件執行固定污染源之相關緊急應變措施。13.掌握各大公私場所空氣污染物減量空間,擇定4家辦理減量協談或輔導評鑑作業。14.辦理3場次許可及相關法令宣導說明會或空氣污染防制專責人員教育訓練。15.辦理本縣3家公私場所溫室氣體盤查作業。16.其他配合事項。 一般性巡查及現場查核共執行135家次,巡查目的區分,陳情案現場查核件數50家次為最多,其中非屬列管對象有21家次,經查核後新增列管2家。另外,列管工廠中經由現場例行巡查,因關廠停工共篩除列管30家。 排放量清查及更新共執行70家次,以資料庫中欄位缺漏、排放量不合理與3年內未曾清查為優先清查對象,清查後更新粒狀物增加46.722公噸、硫氧化物增加16.638公噸、氮氧化物減少25.823公噸及揮發性有機物減少55.073公噸。 法規符合度一級查核20家次、二級查核50家次共完成70家次207張操作許可證查核,其中有32張許可不符情形,最多的不符原因是設備數與許可核定內容不符(佔50%),且多發生在分類於二級的工廠,顯示二級工廠因查核頻率較少,缺少對許可要求的認知,這是近幾三年來分級查核後二級工廠常見的情形。 六輕以外的許可申請案件共受理233件,經審查後核發169張設置與操作許可證,審查時程皆符合時程並於規定的發證一個月內建檔;另協助六輕核發之82張許可證資料建檔及書面文件資料保存。 經由巡查、排放量清查與法規符合度查核本計畫完成254家次的更新維護擴充作業;另外加油站計畫亦提報232家次加油站清查資料,所以共完成486家次列管工廠資料庫維護更新擴充。 97年四季空污費共徵收91,089,778元,四季到繳率皆達100%,因雲林縣一向到繳率甚高,故催補繳家次44家次,金額僅39,809元。 稽查檢測作業共執行一般檢測12根次、戴奧辛2根次、重金屬2根次、RATA 3根次、煙道異味8根次及油品含硫份抽測20件次。對象篩選原則以曾抽測不合格或遭民眾陳情為對象。抽測結果3家不合格分別是戴奧辛、煙道異味及油品含硫份,已將報告提送環保局並建議告發處分。 固定污染源自動連線監測系統管理,由專人每日負責處理超限或上傳申報資料,每月至少2次資料備份及作業系統管理,每月1次硬體維護及重整系統目錄。 網路審查定期檢測報告與排放量申報量,雲林縣定檢煙道第一批211根、第二批114根皆已完成檢測,但有11根次未於30日內上網申報資料;排放量97年度應上網申報134廠519件次,尚有10件次未完成申報,已通知業者應盡速申報。 辦理4家辦理污染減量協談輔導作業,ㄧ家燃材鍋爐輔導後裝增設洗滌塔來控制木材燃燒後易造成的黑煙;一家膠帶製造業提高廢氣集氣效率,可符合98.1.1起的加嚴標準;其餘2家因於98.3.3.19才辦理輔導,已將委員意見函文業者回覆辦理情形。 辦理4場次法令說明會,內容分別是許可申請及相關法規說明會、豆皮廠空污防制許可說明會、專責人員複訓與固定污染源逸散性粒狀污染物空氣污染防制設施管理辦法說明會。每場出席人數皆達八成以上,亦將說明會簡報資料置放於環保局網站供未能出席的業者下載,並提供諮詢專線回答業者的疑問。 辦理3廠溫室氣體盤查,估算工廠的溫室氣體排放量。溫室氣體來源主要由範疇一的直接排放源,並有99%以上來自固定式燃燒排放源,可見工廠要降低其溫室氣體排放量,仍需由使用燃料改善著手。
中文關鍵字 固定污染源,許可,排放量,逸散

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 經費年度 097 計畫經費 8550 千元
專案開始日期 2008/04/12 專案結束日期 2009/03/31 專案主持人 苗宛陶
主辦單位 雲林縣環境保護局 承辦人 執行單位 台灣曼寧工程顧問股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 97年固定期末完整稿.pdf 5MB [期末報告]公開完整版

Project of Year 2008 for controlling and inspecting of stationary sources

英文摘要 The execution duration of this project is from April 12th, 2008 to March 31st, 2009. 12-month duration is divided into 16 key points: 1. To execute general inspection at minimum of 70 institutions aside from Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project. 2. To execute thorough check on emission amount and data renewal of minimum of 70 public and private institutions aside from Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project. 3. To execute classified examination on regulation compliance of minimum of 70 public and private institutions aside from Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project. 4. To execute the evaluation, issuance, and data establishment of permit application aside from Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project. 5. To execute the management of additional, updates, and maintenance of public and private institution information database in “Control of Stationary Sources of Air Pollution Information System”. 6. To process the application, evaluation, data establishment, and payment reminder for Stationary Pollution Source Air Pollution Control Fees. 7. To execute each inspection and examination process in public and private institutions. 8. Besides Sixth Cracking Industrial Park, to execute minimum of one examination on each of the air pollution stationary sources which conform to dioxin control and emission standard. 9. To manage the online monitoring system of air pollution stationary sources in this county. 10. To manage annual air pollutant emission declaration system on Internet 11. To manage and evaluate the system for air pollution stationary sources declaration. 12. To execute emergency response measures related to stationary sources of air pollution in coordination with the air quality deterioration or severe air pollution cases. 13. To control the reduced air pollutant emission rates of each public and private institution. 4 premises were chosen for emission reduction discussion, or counseling. 14. To organize 3 meetings of permit and regulation related promotion meetings. Or, to organize training held by specialized personnel of air pollution control. 15. To process the examination of GHG at 3 public and private institutions in this county. 16. Other matters of coordination. General inspection and on-site examination were executed at 135 institutions. There are total of 50 institutions of pleading cases in the on-site inspection which marks the highest number of cases among all the inspection objectives. Among all, 21 institutions are not from the controlled list. After examination, there are additional of 2 institutions listed in the controlled list. Furthermore, during the regular on-site inspection, there are 30 institutions were found shut down and thus were taken out from the controlled list. Total of 70 institutions were done with the emission amount examination and data renewal. Insufficient data, unreasonable emission, and institutions which have not been examined in the past three years are prioritized in this examination. Upon completion of examination, the following is found: particles pollutant increment of 46.722 metric tons, SOx increased 16.638 metric tons, NOx decreased 25.823 metric tons, and VOCs decreased 55.073 metric tons. First level examination on regulation conformation was carried out at 20 institutions. Meanwhile, second level examination was completed at 50 institutions. Total completion of 70 institutions and 207 operation permits were checked. There are 32 permits not conforming to regulations with most of the reasons which the facilities are not in conformity with the approved content as stated in the permit (occupies 50%). This happens mostly in secondary factories. This shows that due to the lower examination frequency on secondary factories, the owners are lacking of permit requirement cognition. It has been the common phenomena happen on secondary factories when classified examination takes place in recent three years. Aside from Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project, there are 233 permit application received. 169 Installation and Operating Permits were issued after evaluation. Investigations were carried out on time and data establishment upon permit issuance is completed within the stipulated one month period. Besides, this project also assists permit data establishment and documentation storage of the 82 permits issued by Sixth Naphtha Cracking Project. Through inspection, emission examination, and regulation conformity; this project completed the renewal, maintenance, and expansion of data of 254 institutions. In addition, gas station project reported the examination information of 232 gas stations. Therefore, the database of 486 controlled institutions is maintained, renewed, and expanded. In year 2008, air pollution fee for all quarters levied NT$91,089,778. And, paid-up percentage for all quarters is 100%. As Yunlin County has been the county with high in paid-up percentage, payment reminders were only being sent to 44 institutions with the only amount of NT$39,809. Examination operation executed total of 12 pipes in general examination, 2 pipes of dioxin, 2 pipes of heavy metal, 3 RATA, 8 flue pipe odor pollution, and 20 of sulphur content in oil products. The principles in object selection are the institutions which previously failed the examination or the institutions complained by public. There are 3 institutions which did not pass the examination of dioxin, fuel pipe odor, and sulphur content in oil products. The reports were sent to Environmental Protection Bureau and suggestions were made to lodge accusation and for disciplinary action. For online monitoring system management of air pollution stationary sources, assigned personnel is responsible to process over-limit or upload declaration information. In every month, minimum of 2 times of data backup and operating system management need to be done. And, at least one time of hardware maintenance and system defragment are required every month. Internet evaluation regularly examines reports and declared emission amount. The regular inspection of Yunlin County completed 211 pipes in the first batch and 114 pipes in the second batch. But there are 5 pipes which have not submit information on internet within 30 days. In terms of emission amount, in year 2008, total of 134 factories with 519 cases are suppose to submit report on the internet. There are 10 cases which have not completed with the declaration. Notices were sent to the related institutions to expedite report. 4 pollution reduction counseling were conducted. A coal boiler installed washing tower after counseling session as to control the smoke emitted from wood burning. And, an adhesive tape manufacturer increased waste gas capture efficiency and conformed to the stricter standards of Jan 1st, 2009. Meanwhile, counseling of the other 2 institutions was just completed on March 19th 2009. Committee suggestions were sent to the institutions and awaiting their responses. 4 regulation promotion meetings were held, respectively discussed the permit application and related regulation, dried bean curd factory air pollution prevention and permission, specialized personnel recurrent training, and air pollution control measure management of fugitive particulate pollutant of air pollution stationary sources. There were more than 80% of attendees in each of the above mentioned meeting. For those business owners who did make it to the meetings, brief meeting reports are available for download at Environmental Protection Bureau website. Besides, a counseling phone line is set up to answer questions of business owners. GHG check at 3 factories was completed to estimate GHGs emission amount. The main source of GHG is the direct emission of category one, and over 99% resulted from stationary burning emission. This shows that in order to decrease GHGs of factories, improvement on fuel needs to be prioritized.
英文關鍵字 stationary sources, permit, emission, fugitive, RATA(Relative Accuracy Test Audit)