「以生命週期分析廢容器回收體制及市場價格對回收管道之影響」專案工作計畫
| 中文摘要 | (一) 針對不同廢容器回收模式，以生命週期評估概念盤查各階段能資源使用狀況與污染物排放情形；其中，「以回收業為主體」回收模式，建議採行前應建置完善監督機制，並輔以經濟誘因以確保資源回收；「以清潔隊為主體」及「清潔隊與回收業共同參與」等回收模式，就產生源（民眾）、收集者（清潔隊）及分類者已分別研提相關改良方案與措施，以促進資源回收。 (二) 透過蒐集市場交易價格，並利用迴歸分析建立市場價格預測模式，另研提以「躉售物價指數（WPI）」作為執行機關與業者訂定變賣價格變動參考依據。 (三) 透過調查/分析公告應回收廢容器未進入認證補貼體系之比例及推估數量，以掌握國內廢容器流布。另調查發現廢鋁容器補貼費遠低於市場交易價格，係業者考量分類/稽核認證行政成本，故有較多已回收已分類但不認證情形；廢紙容器由於業者基於利潤考量，混入廢紙未進入認證體系。 (四) 調查廢容器相關回收處理成本，並配合促進容器商品環保化設計與推行單一補貼費率政策，研提99年廢容器回收清除處理費率與補貼費率建議值。 (五) 透過PLA（聚乳酸）容器產業調查，評估以「就原料源課費」為最適課費模式，並依據環保署指定回收處理方式試算/研擬PLA容器回收清除處理費率及補貼費率。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 生命週期評估，回收，廢容器 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-98-HA14-03-A120 | 經費年度 | 098 | 計畫經費 | 3200 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2009/04/07 | 專案結束日期 | 2009/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 李曼君 |
| 主辦單位 | 回收基管會 | 承辦人 | 吳隆成 | 執行單位 | 財團法人台灣產業服務基金會 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | 以生命週期分析廢容器回收體制及市場價格對回收管道之影響專案工作計劃(公開版).pdf | 12MB |
A Life-Cycle Analysis of Waste Container Recycling System and the Market Price Effect on the Recycli
| 英文摘要 | This project applied the concept of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and carried out life cycle inventory analyses to explore the energy consumption and emissions of pollutants during all stages within different collection models for waste containers. Moreover, it is advised that a supervision mechanism should be employed before implementing "to be collected by recycling companies" model, which could be further supported by providing economic incentives. In terms of "to be collected by sanitation teams" and "to be collected jointly by sanitation teams and recycling companies " models, improvement plans and measures were proposed for the source of generation (general public), the collector (sanitation team) and the classifier to facilitate resource recycling. Forecasting models for price were established through regression analysis based on surveying relevant market prices of the regulated recyclable waste containers. Moreover, the project has identified the "wholesale price index (WPI)" as a reference price for enforcement authorities (sanitation teams) and recycling companies to consider changing the sale price. In order to master the domestic flow of the waste containers, this project has surveyed / analyzed the proportion of the regulated recyclable waste containers which do not entered into the certification recycling system. For aluminum containers, many are recovered, sorted but not certified. The reason is that subsidized fees have been much lower than the market prices and collectors often take the administrative costs of classification and certification in consideration. Besides, waste paper containers are often mixed into waste papers due to profit considerations, so do not enter into the certification recycling system. To investigate the collection and recycling costs for the regulated recyclable waste containers, and to comply with the EPA’s policy (to facilitate the environmentally friendly design of container goods and to promote one-stage subsidy, etc.), the project has proposed recommended levies and subsidies for collecting and recycling containers. By surveying the domestic PLA container industry, the project has concluded that the optimal billing model is "billing from raw material source." In addition, the project has estimated/devised collection and recycling levies and subsidies for PLA containers based on the recycling approach designated by the EPA—"the material recycling (Re-granulation)", and made recommendations to EPA for future consideration. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | Life-Cycle Assessment, Recycling, Waste Containers | ||