環境資源報告成果查詢系統

地區毒化物災害潛勢分析與評估計畫

中文摘要 環保署為管理毒化物災害預防與應變工作,讓救災支援體系及民間機構深入瞭解本身潛在危險狀況,故擬發展地區毒災害潛勢分析方法,以分析與評估災害可能發生位置與風險,以事前洞悉掌握有助於以降低危害影響。 本計畫即針對毒災害潛勢分析,於九十七年十二月提出期末報告,完成下列工作項目: 1、本計畫遴選台南縣地區內路段,毒性化學物質運輸量大且頻率較高之路段(高速公路、省道、縣道等),進行災害潛勢分析與危險度評估,再藉以瞭解各區域的陸運毒化物運輸災害潛勢情形。 (1) 按環保署毒化物運作六聯單申報資料通盤調查起訖地點、運送物質種類、運送儲存量、運送車次等資料,並以統計分析研究範圍之毒化物陸路運輸特性(如年平均運送量、車次、頻率等)、按毒化物分類分布性及各種類物、化性質探討危險影響程度。 (2) 調查該區域移動源毒化物運作特點(運作路線、各道路平均車流量、年平均肇事案件等),藉分析結果篩選出最具代表性運送物質(至少5種),進行災害後果分析。 2、擴散模式之軟體數值參數本土化,繪製地區毒化災潛勢風險圖。 實際運用環保署毒性化學物質申報資料庫,針對毒性化學物質運輸量大且頻率較高之路段,依建立模式分析方法進行區域廠場之座標定位、災害潛勢分析與危險度評估,以瞭解各區域的毒化物災害潛勢情形。 3、完成示範縣市區域毒性化學物質之毒化物運輸災害潛勢模擬評估。 藉分析地區移動式毒化物災害潛勢,設定該區域災害可能情境,畫設災害應變之冷、熱區,並與示範地區救災支援單位交通路網分析,規劃應變救災、疏散及避難路線,篩選符合適當之應變中心地點、避難場所。 4、應用區域毒化物運輸災害潛勢分析,可提供縣市政府環保與救災支 援單位作為毒化物災害防救資源配置之參考。 依區域的毒化災運輸潛勢分析結果,與縣市政府環保及救災支援單位,其現行人力、器具等資源配置,通盤考量比較優缺點、適用性探討及可行性,俾作為日後縣市政府環保及救災支援單位災害應變之參考。 5、實施教育訓練與技術移轉和推廣。 透過持續性、定期性與交流性的訓練課程,並強化災害預防及相關整備措施,提供救災單位應變路線與資源配置之最適化,發揮整體救災效率,減輕災害損失。
中文關鍵字 風險分析,潛勢,毒化物災害

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-97-U1J1-02-102 經費年度 097 計畫經費 1470 千元
專案開始日期 2008/04/01 專案結束日期 2008/12/31 專案主持人 陳政任
主辦單位 環管處 承辦人 盧家惠 執行單位 國立高雄第一科技大學

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 05_基本摘要內容.pdf 0MB [期末報告]公開版

Risk Potential Analysis and Assessment for Local Area Toxic Substances Disasters

英文摘要 Taiwan EPA is in charge of toxic substance disaster prevention and response work. Thus, it is intended to develop a methodology that can analyze the potential risk in an area in order to help the emergency response system and local operating facilities to have a better understanding of the potential risk, and better prepared in case of emergency. This project aimed at risk potential analysis for toxic substance disasters. The final report is submitted in December 2008. The project has completed the following works: 1. Select routes with high frequency of transporting toxic substances to perform risk potential analysis and risk degree assessment. (1) Collect the toxic transporting forms submitted to EPA to find the statistics data for transporting routes, type of substances, transporting quantities, frequency of transportation. (2) Analyze the characteristics of the toxic transporting data to find five representative substances and perform consequence analysis. 2. Final local parameters for dispersion modeling. Draw the risk potential map. Apply the toxic transporting data to perform the risk potential for routes with high frequency and large quantity of transporting toxic substances. The routes are digitalized and an area risk potential map is drawn, the degree of risk are marked. 3. Complete the risk potential analysis for transporting toxic substances for one demonstration county. From the risk potential map, potential area for hot zone and cold zone can be drawn. The routes for response and evacuation can also be drawn. The possible locations for emergency response center and shelter locations can also be identified in the map. 4. Provide the risk potential analysis results for application by county environmental bureau and disaster rescue supporting units. From the risk potential map, it is possible to assess adequacy of the manpower and available equipment in county environmental bureau and disaster rescue supporting units 5. Provide training and technology transfer Provide continuing, regular training courses to county environmental bureau and disaster rescue supporting units for exchange of experiences and technology development. This will help to reinforce the optimization of response route selection, and allocation of resources. Overall, the response efficiency can be improved and losses from a disaster can be reduced.
英文關鍵字 riak analysis,harzard potential,toxic substance disaster