| 英文摘要 |
The task of this project was to carry out the permit reviewing of environmental agents and toxic chemical substances. The completed tasks were permit reviewing on manufacturing and import, as well as sample production. Also, the comparison of regulatory management among the U.S., Japan, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Taiwan were studied. The ingredients and toxicity information of environmental agents and toxic chemical substances were complied. All the aforementioned tasks were completed to enhance the safety management.
The review mechanism along with Environmental Agents & Toxic Chemical Substance Auxiliary Permit Reviewing System, EATCSAPRS) were established. The review time was shortened and standardized operation made management efficiency higher.
For the environmental agent permit reviewing, 200 applications were reviewed, and the applicants submitted 1,423 descriptive documents. 35 percent of the actual reviewing time was shorten when compared with expected reviewing time. For the toxic chemical substance permit reviewing, 101 applications were reviewed, and the applicants submitted 842 descriptive documents. There were 32.1 percent of the actual reviewing time shorten when compared with expected reviewing time. Such achievement effectively raised management efficiency.
To reduce the possibility of application rejection or resubmission due to incorrect application content, we held 3 training sessions to local EPB and enterprises. These training sessions effectively lowered the chances of application resubmission and increased the management efficiency by delivering precise instruction on how to make correct application.
The ingredients and toxicity information of environmental agents and toxic chemical substances database was established. The establishment of this information database enabled the EPA to better manage the environmental agents and toxic chemical substances.
The environmental agents and toxic chemical substances permitting regulation on the U.S., Japan, and FAO were carried out and an information platform was established. Such comparison enabled the EPA to understand better the current international management.
|