環境資源報告成果查詢系統

車用汽柴油品質管理暨現場查核專案工作計畫

中文摘要 1.完成本年度車用汽柴油空氣污染防制費之受理申報、審查及催補件作業,全國累計銷售的汽油數量為973萬公秉及柴油數量為434萬公秉,一、二、三級汽油比例分別為25%、54%、21%,柴油比例為15%、49%、36%。繳納汽油空污費為8.53億元及柴油空污費為4.93億元,今年度與去年比較結果汽油銷售量增加,柴油銷售量與去年差不多,而空污費減少是因為汽油品質提升所致。 2.本年度配合環保署至中油桃園廠及台塑麥寮廠執行空污費申報資料不定期抽查,釐清本年度申報資料異常的相關資料。 3.本年度抽驗完成228個汽油及202個柴油的油槽與加油站樣品的採樣與分析,其結果符合管制規範。並且完成修正移動污染源網路申報系統,業者已經使用本系統進行空氣污染防制費的申報。 4.完成採樣檢驗95個酒精汽油及82個生質柴油樣品,依據檢驗結果更新生質能源NIR查驗資料庫,確認可作為生質能源篩檢之工具,以檢測酒精汽油中乙醇含量及生質柴油中脂肪酸甲酯的含量,以此方法與業者進行生質燃料樣品分析比對,宣導業者建立生質能源快速檢測系統,隨時監控出廠品質。 5.完成45個疑似非法油品檢驗,其中有1個樣品確認為添加煤油,2個樣品為添加廢溶劑油,1個樣品為漁船用油及1個樣品添加20%脂肪酸甲酯。 6.以測試油品完成陸用引擎性能試驗及漁船引擎測試,實驗結果陸用引擎使用新配方漁船用油運轉較不順暢;而漁船使用新配方漁船用油則無不良影響,因此新配方漁船油可以達到計畫目標。同時針對新配方漁船用油研究成果召開2次專家學者座談會。 7.本年度完成輔導國內8個縣市環保局建立以攜帶式密度儀篩檢非法油品相關技術,並瞭解非法油品稽查執行現況。 8.召開2場專家學者座談會,討論汽油中烯烴及芳香烴管制標準及下一階段「車用汽柴油成分管制標準」實施時間,經協商與溝通後已取得共識。已協助環保署於98年7月29日公告下一階段「車用汽柴油成分管制標準」。 9.因應新標準即將實施,本計畫已提出空污費率修正建議,建議汽油以芳香烴、烯烴、硫含量,柴油以多環芳香烴、硫含量作為分級的依據。 10.辦理「2009年車用汽柴油油品查驗及改善技術研討會」,會中邀請國內學者專家演講世界能源安全議題及汽柴油品質與車輛類廢氣的關聯,並討論下一階段空污費分級收費方式。
中文關鍵字 車用油品;汽油、柴油、空氣污染防制費、油品品質、查驗、查核

基本資訊

專案計畫編號 EPA-98-FA13-03-D013 經費年度 098 計畫經費 12000 千元
專案開始日期 2009/01/01 專案結束日期 2009/12/31 專案主持人 馮嘉祺
主辦單位 空保處 承辦人 柏雪翠 執行單位 亞太環境科技股份有限公司

成果下載

類型 檔名 檔案大小 說明
期末報告 98年度車用汽柴油品質管理暨現場查核(EPA-98-FA13-03-D013).pdf 36MB

Monitoring the Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Quality

英文摘要 1. The auditing of gasoline/diesel air pollution fees in 2009 has been completed, and the results were quite satisfactory. The total accumulated sales volumes of gasoline and diesel were 9.73 and 4.34 million kilolitres, respectively. The proportional volumes of sold primary, secondary and third grade gasoline were 25%, 54% and 21%, respectively, while those of diesel were 15%, 49% and 36%. The air pollution fees associated with gasoline and diesel were NT$853,000,000 and NT$493,000,000, respectively. These gasoline sales volumes exceeded those of last year while the diesel sales volumes were approximately the same. The decrease in air pollution fees was associated with improved gasoline fuel quality. 2. Coordination with EPA to the Taoyuan Refinery of Chinese Petroleum Corp. and the Mailiao Complex of Formosa Petrochemical Corp. to implement the non-periodical auditing of the air pollution fees reporting documentation to clarify if there was any abnormality in the reported information for this year. 3. In this year, two hundred and twenty-eight (228) random gasoline samples and two hundred and two (202) random diesel samples, taken from fuel storage tanks and gas stations, were sampled and analyzed. All of the results complied with regulations. Modification of the air pollution fees internet reporting system was completed this year and business operators have been using the system to process reports on air pollution fees. 4. Sampling and analysis of ninety-five (95) ethanol gasoline samples and eighty-two (82) bio-diesel samples was completed to update the near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy database, to ensure that it can be used as an instant probing system to measure the ethanol content in alcohol gasoline and the fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) content in bio-diesel. Using the system to test the quality of bio-fuel for comparative analysis with business operators and encourage them setting up a prompt examination system monitors fuel quality immediately. 5. Forty-five (45) suspected unlawful fuel samples were analyzed. One sample was confirmed to contain added kerosene; two samples contained added waste solvent; one sample was fishing boat oil, and one sample contained 20% added FAME. 6. Fishing boat oil with a new formula was used in engine tests in automobiles and in fishing boat separately to analyze its effect on these engines. The results demonstrated that the new formula oil adversely affects automobile engines. The use of this new formula oil in the fishing boat has no negative impact on the performance of the engine. Therefore this new formula fishing boat oil may have achieved the goal of this project. Two meetings were held with experts to discuss the results of the research concerning the new fishing boat fuel formula. 7. A consultation project to help environmental protection bureaus of eight counties and cities established the effective approaches for using a portable density meter to screen illegal fuel and to improve understanding of current illegal fuel auditing practices. 8. Two meetings were held with experts to discuss the standards for olefin and aromatic contents in gasoline, and a timetable for the implementation of “Standards for the Composition of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels”. Consensus was reached by negotiation. Those results above facilitated enacting of EPA “Standards for the Composition of Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuels” on 29th July 2009. 9. In response to the new standards that will be implemented soon, suggestions have been made for adjusting the air pollution fees. The suggestion has been made that they be set according to aromatic, olefin and sulfur contents in gasoline, and the poly-aromatic hydrocarbons and sulfur contents in diesel fuel. 10. The “2009 Automobile Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Quality Inspection and Improvement Technology Conference” was held. Domestic scholars and experts were invited to address issues concerning the safety of global energy resources and the relationship between the quality of gasoline and diesel fuel and automobile emissions. Classifications for the collection of air pollution fees were also discussed.
英文關鍵字 Gasoline, Diesel, Air Pollution Fee, Fuel Quality, Monitoring, Auditing