廢電子電器及廢資訊物品回收處理體系運作架構革新專案工作計畫
| 中文摘要 | 本研究調查電子電器販賣業者之廢家電報廢流向，並規劃3種回收管控模式，透過層級分析評估法與6場諮詢會議，完成草案規劃及電子化管控回收模式優選。未來除加強業者電子化申報操作之教育訓練，亦建議將補貼費用直接撥付經銷業者以提升誘因；此外蒐集歷年處理資訊並分析設備效益變動、最低運轉成本、甲處許可狀況等，以瞭解處理廠營運，再提出3項處理體系改造方案及差別補貼規劃。本計畫透過五場座談會討論方案妥適性，並建議未來依相關社經指標與資料檢視成本合理性；另外公開遴選惠嘉電公司並輔導發表「98年度環境績效與永續發展報告書」。建議未來應鼓勵業者自願性參與，並依相關評估指標之運用對處理業者進行分級管理，以提升處理業者之素質；最後於遴選後完成5篇國際論文翻譯，並蒐集歐盟WEEE現況指令、建立交流窗口23國家、39組織、42筆聯絡管道，在第四屆世界資源回收論壇會議發表「台灣廢電子電器物品回收處理機制」一文。建議未來可參考歐盟將產品環保相關要求整合於CE標誌上，並在維持國際交流上建議指定統一窗口，以有效管理及維繫聯絡管道。 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 中文關鍵字 | 資源回收政策、逆物流、延伸生產者責任制、廢電子電器及廢資訊物品 | ||
基本資訊
| 專案計畫編號 | EPA-98-HA14-03-A177 | 經費年度 | 098 | 計畫經費 | 3600 千元 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 專案開始日期 | 2009/05/21 | 專案結束日期 | 2009/12/31 | 專案主持人 | 伍中流 |
| 主辦單位 | 回收基管會 | 承辦人 | 吳柏宏 | 執行單位 | 台灣檢驗科技股份有限公司 |
成果下載
| 類型 | 檔名 | 檔案大小 | 說明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 期末報告 | 期末報告全文.rar | 13MB |
The Innovation of Recycling System for Waste Household Appliances and Waste Electronics IT Objects.
| 英文摘要 | From our study, the current collection of the wasted household appliances is set up in 3 different ways. In this project, a simple AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was adopted to find out the most suitable feasible business control measures and 6 meetings were called up to collect opinions for EPA’s considerations. Base on the foregoing result, we have some recommendations as below: Provide the training for free and allow every organization to assist retailers in the computerized take-back operation; In the long term, assess the way that a part of subsidies are allotted to retailers for raising implementation performance. We have collected the recycled quantity of each subsidized organization to analyze their unit costs & the minimum cost to run the business. In addition, we have investigated the status of Grade A clearance organizations (disposal organizations) license. And comment on out where in the waste is likely to get more benefits for the subsidized organizations. We proposed 3 action plans for the reformation plan and 5 meetings were called up to collect/exchange opinions for EPA’s considerations. For avoiding that subsidized organizations give an inflated figure in a report and affect the survey of recycling cost, we recommend to calculate the operation cost by socioeconomic status. We have publicly invited the subsidized organizations to join this program. FGD recycling Industrial Co., Ltd was qualified to be the demonstrative example. We recommend that the authorities provide incentives to those subsidized organizations who voluntarily disclosed their environmental information. The authorities would utilize related indexes to carry out the assessment to subsidized organizations for differentiating the subsidies. We have translated 20 abstracts of WEEE related articles and 7 out of them were completely translated. Besides, have contacted 42 scholars/specialists spread over 23 countries and 39 foreign organizations with 1 paper presented “The Mechanism of WEEE recycling and Treatment in Taiwan” in the 4th World Recycling Forum. Our recommendations are: (1) In the product aspect, EU integrates all of the environmental requirements into CE mark. This integrated product certification policy can be served as a good reference for government. (2) the international information exchange should be communicated via an exclusive focal point (single contact window) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 英文關鍵字 | Recycling policy, Reverse logistic, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment | ||