| 英文摘要 |
This study collected the environmental noise and traffic noise measurement
results from local government to analyze the cause of disqualifying stations and
suggest the improvable measure. The percentage of qualifying hour intervals of
environmental noise level was above 90% in first three quarter of 2009, so it would
achieve the yearly target 87.5% in 2009. For realizing the cause of the disqualifying
station, there were twenty-one noise as well as twenty-six days measurements in
situ and then several improvable ways were proposed to help the future monitoring. 2
This study also reviewed all the in-use environmental and traffic noise station and
then classified by their locations, then analyzed and proposed several reasons which
affected the noise measurement in such locations and give some suggestions for
representative. Three meetings for noise measurement were hold to explain the noise
measurement and disqualifying situation. One training conference was hold to
introduce the noise metric, monitoring in situ and the draft of traffic noise standards
and noise control plan. The draft of “Environmental Sound Level Standards”
amendment was proposed and under discussing by EPA, and the “Fee Collection
Standards for Noise Control Act” was promulgated. The noise control standards
announced by various county/city governments pursuant to Article 8 and 9 of the
Noise Control Act vary significantly largely due to their different city types and
public lifestyles. For the questionnaire survey collected 1,235 effective samples, this
project suggested that indoor folk activities noise be controlled in accordance with
regulations on improper behaviors during noise sensitive periods in people’s normal
daily schedule. In addition, this project has assisted in the control operations of
noise-related science group programs to make their benefits meet the operation and
performance requirements of the National Science Council.
|