環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	108-016-1
經費年度	108
計畫經費	1,425 千元
專案開始日期	2019/07/04
專案結束日期	2019/11/30
專案主持人	黃招斌
主辦單位	雲林縣環境保護局
承辦人	甘尚玉
執行單位	元科科技股份有限公司
專案分類	水質保護
中文關鍵字	沼液沼渣、畜牧業、示範場
英文關鍵字	biogas fermentation、animal husbandry、demonstrative areas
協同主持人	范千靖
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳昭羽
計畫聯絡電話	05-5332462#
計畫聯絡信箱	s684190@gmail.com

中文摘要	本擴充計畫主要進行已核定施灌之成效追蹤，在已核准通過申請，可進行沼液沼渣施灌之畜牧場成效追蹤方面，已完成104點次地下水豐、枯水期監測(包含複測20點次、不包含環保署監測站及扣除共用地下水監測井重複之點次)及129點次土壤監測作業，其監測結果土壤均未超過土壤污染監測標準，而在地下水監測方面，枯水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有4點次(2點次為上游，2點次為下游)；豐水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有8點次(1點次為上游，6點次為下游，1點次為區域監測井)，經探討監測井位於施灌範圍上游，應非為本案施灌沼液所造成，而下游超標之畜牧場，經檢視施灌紀錄後，實際施灌量皆未達核定施灌量之50 %，故推測下游氨氮超標亦應非為施灌沼液、沼渣所造成，可能是受到地理位置或鄰近農地施灑化學肥料所致，後續仍將持續監測，以釐清氨氮測值是否有明顯上升。另於每三個月追蹤施灌情形，及已協助43場場家提出施灌評析報告。為獎勵已申請核定之畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣農地肥分使用之畜牧場，特規劃雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣農地肥分使用優良畜牧場選拔競賽，並針對得獎之畜牧場進行公開表揚。並已於11月27日辦理畜牧糞尿資源化成果發表記者會，說明目前畜牧糞尿資源化推展成效，並結合雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣優良畜牧場選拔頒獎，讓大家能清楚了解雲林縣的推動情形。另於9月23日及9月24日辦理畜牧糞尿資源化觀摩活動，當天參與人數達20人，此次觀摩會中使畜牧業者瞭解如何以槽車運送進行農田施灌，同時更可透過實地參訪與業者進行交流，減少畜牧戶之疑慮。
中文關鍵字	沼液沼渣、畜牧業、示範場

中文摘要

本擴充計畫主要進行已核定施灌之成效追蹤，在已核准通過申請，可進行沼液沼渣施灌之畜牧場成效追蹤方面，已完成104點次地下水豐、枯水期監測(包含複測20點次、不包含環保署監測站及扣除共用地下水監測井重複之點次)及129點次土壤監測作業，其監測結果土壤均未超過土壤污染監測標準，而在地下水監測方面，枯水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有4點次(2點次為上游，2點次為下游)；豐水期複測後仍超過停灌標準者計有8點次(1點次為上游，6點次為下游，1點次為區域監測井)，經探討監測井位於施灌範圍上游，應非為本案施灌沼液所造成，而下游超標之畜牧場，經檢視施灌紀錄後，實際施灌量皆未達核定施灌量之50 %，故推測下游氨氮超標亦應非為施灌沼液、沼渣所造成，可能是受到地理位置或鄰近農地施灑化學肥料所致，後續仍將持續監測，以釐清氨氮測值是否有明顯上升。另於每三個月追蹤施灌情形，及已協助43場場家提出施灌評析報告。為獎勵已申請核定之畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣農地肥分使用之畜牧場，特規劃雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣農地肥分使用優良畜牧場選拔競賽，並針對得獎之畜牧場進行公開表揚。並已於11月27日辦理畜牧糞尿資源化成果發表記者會，說明目前畜牧糞尿資源化推展成效，並結合雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼液沼渣優良畜牧場選拔頒獎，讓大家能清楚了解雲林縣的推動情形。另於9月23日及9月24日辦理畜牧糞尿資源化觀摩活動，當天參與人數達20人，此次觀摩會中使畜牧業者瞭解如何以槽車運送進行農田施灌，同時更可透過實地參訪與業者進行交流，減少畜牧戶之疑慮。

中文關鍵字

沼液沼渣、畜牧業、示範場

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	108年雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼渣沼液農地肥分使用推動暨評估計畫(後續擴充)(定稿).pdf	6MB	108年雲林縣畜牧糞尿沼渣沼液農地肥分使用推動暨評估計畫(後續擴充)(定稿)	2020/2/28 上午 12:00:00

摘要	This extended plan mainly carries out the effectiveness tracking of approved irrigation, promotes the utilization of animal husbandry and urine resources, and sets up a fleet of irrigation and transportation vehicles. Regarding the effectiveness tracking of livestock farms that have been approved for application of biogas fermentation residue, there are 104 times of groundwater monitoring for high and low water level periods (including 20 times of retest, excluding EPA monitoring station and shared groundwater monitoring well) and 129 times of soil monitoring operations which have been completed. The monitoring results have not exceeded the soil pollution monitoring standards. Regarding the groundwater monitoring, there are 4 times (2 times for the upstream and 2 times for the downstream) after the retesting in the low water level period. The overtake number after the retest in the high water level period is 8 times (1 for the upstream and 6 for the downstream and 1 for the area monitoring well). It is because the monitoring well is located in the upstream of the irrigation area, and it should not be caused by the application of the biogas fermentation residue in this case. In addition, the livestock farms that exceeded the standard in the downstream, after examining the records of irrigation, in the case of an unapplied behavior, the actual application rate did not reach 50% of the approved application rate. Therefore, it is speculated that the excessive ammonia nitrogen downstream should not be caused by the application of biogas slurry and biogas residue, which may be caused by the geographical location or the application of chemical fertilizers to adjacent agricultural land. Monitoring will continue to clarify whether the ammonia nitrogen measurement has significantly increased. Moreover, the irrigation condition was tracked every three months, and there are 43 field experts submit the evaluation report. In order to reward the livestock farms that have applied for the application of biogas fermentation, a selection contest for the use of excellent livestock farms for livestock manure, manure slurry, biogas residues, and farmland fertilization, and public praise for the award-winning livestock farms. On November 27, the press conference on the results of livestock manure and urine resource utilization was published to explain the current effectiveness of the promotion of animal manure and urine resource utilization. In conjunction with the selection of excellent livestock pastures from Yunlin County's animal manure, urine, biogas, and biogas residues, we can clearly understand Yunlin driving situation. In addition, the usage of the biogas fermentation residue farmland fertilizers was observed on September 23 and September 24. The number of participants on the day reached 36. During the observation meeting, the livestock farmers learned how to transport by tanker transports. Meanwhile, it can communicate with the visitors through the field to reduce the doubts of the livestock farmers.
英文關鍵字	biogas fermentation、animal husbandry、demonstrative areas

摘要

This extended plan mainly carries out the effectiveness tracking of approved irrigation, promotes the utilization of animal husbandry and urine resources, and sets up a fleet of irrigation and transportation vehicles. Regarding the effectiveness tracking of livestock farms that have been approved for application of biogas fermentation residue, there are 104 times of groundwater monitoring for high and low water level periods (including 20 times of retest, excluding EPA monitoring station and shared groundwater monitoring well) and 129 times of soil monitoring operations which have been completed. The monitoring results have not exceeded the soil pollution monitoring standards. Regarding the groundwater monitoring, there are 4 times (2 times for the upstream and 2 times for the downstream) after the retesting in the low water level period. The overtake number after the retest in the high water level period is 8 times (1 for the upstream and 6 for the downstream and 1 for the area monitoring well). It is because the monitoring well is located in the upstream of the irrigation area, and it should not be caused by the application of the biogas fermentation residue in this case. In addition, the livestock farms that exceeded the standard in the downstream, after examining the records of irrigation, in the case of an unapplied behavior, the actual application rate did not reach 50% of the approved application rate. Therefore, it is speculated that the excessive ammonia nitrogen downstream should not be caused by the application of biogas slurry and biogas residue, which may be caused by the geographical location or the application of chemical fertilizers to adjacent agricultural land. Monitoring will continue to clarify whether the ammonia nitrogen measurement has significantly increased. Moreover, the irrigation condition was tracked every three months, and there are 43 field experts submit the evaluation report. In order to reward the livestock farms that have applied for the application of biogas fermentation, a selection contest for the use of excellent livestock farms for livestock manure, manure slurry, biogas residues, and farmland fertilization, and public praise for the award-winning livestock farms. On November 27, the press conference on the results of livestock manure and urine resource utilization was published to explain the current effectiveness of the promotion of animal manure and urine resource utilization. In conjunction with the selection of excellent livestock pastures from Yunlin County's animal manure, urine, biogas, and biogas residues, we can clearly understand Yunlin driving situation. In addition, the usage of the biogas fermentation residue farmland fertilizers was observed on September 23 and September 24. The number of participants on the day reached 36. During the observation meeting, the livestock farmers learned how to transport by tanker transports. Meanwhile, it can communicate with the visitors through the field to reduce the doubts of the livestock farmers.

英文關鍵字

biogas fermentation、animal husbandry、demonstrative areas