EPA-98-U1U1-02-101

098

1,700 千元

2009/03/17

2009/12/31

林一為

永續發展室(停用)

吳婉怡

異視行銷市場調查股份有限公司

科技計畫

風險感知；奈米科技；利益

Nanotechnology；Risk Perception；Benefit

林玲舟

林一為

-87723358#1406

well@e-strategy.com.tw

本研究的重點在於提供給政府的相關機關可行的溝通政策，使民眾對於奈米科技有更深入且清楚認識。本計畫透過專家深度訪談、焦點團體座談會與電話訪問調查方式，進行資料的收集，調查的對象包括了相關領域的奈米專家學者、與從事奈米工作的職場員工以及一般民眾。其中以電話訪問方式訪談一般民眾（N=4,600），以面訪方式調查奈米工作的職場員工（N=301）；以及透過網路調查及面訪方式訪問奈米科技專家學者（N=50）。 然而比較今年（98）與去年（97）調查結果發現，對於奈米微粒（奈米級材料）會導致癌症的產生，一般民眾同意程度的比例較去年下降65.0個百分點；專家學者同意程度較去年下降22.4個百分點。對於奈米微粒（奈米級材料）擴散到環境中會對生態產生影響，一般民眾擔心程度的比例較去年下降5.3個百分點；職場員工擔心程度的比例較去年上升28.6個百分點；專家學者擔心程度較去年下降6.8個百分點。對於目前產品業者對奈米科技產品的安全保證，一般民眾信任程度的比例較去年上升13.6個百分點；職場員工信任程度的比例較去年下降1.6個百分點；專家學者信任程度較去年上升2.4個百分點。對於媒體對奈米科技的報導，一般民眾信任程度的比例與去年相同（31.1%）；專家學者信任程度較去年上升0.2個百分點。對於政府部門（如環保署、衛生署等）對奈米科技的管制，一般民眾信任程度的比例較去年上升3.2個百分點；職場員工信任程度的比例較去年上升4.1個百分點；專家學者信任程度較去年下降26.3個百分點。可見不同團體對於奈米科技風險感知的看法都存在極大的不同。建議政府的相關機構可規劃一個良好的溝通措施，並提供更多奈米科技宣導教育及相關研究。

風險感知；奈米科技；利益

行政院環境保護署計畫成果-奈米科技之風險感知及政策研究.pdf

3MB

2010/3/1 上午 12:00:00

The main focus of this study is to help government authorities establish a workable communication policy so that the public can gain a clear and profound understanding of nano technologies. In-depth interviews with experts, focus-group seminars, and telephone surveys were conducted to collect data. Those involved in the polls were: nano experts and scholars in related fields, with their opinions got through Internet surveys and face-to-face interviews (N=50)；people working at the nano-related job sites, with their thoughts attained through face-to-face interviews (N=301)；and the general public, with their responses collected through telephone interviews (N=4,600). In comparison with those of last year, findings of this year show that the approval rating among the general public on the statement that nano particles may cause cancer dropped 65 percentage points while that among the experts and scholars decreased 22.4 percentage points. Regarding the statement that nano particles may produce certain ecological effects when the substances are apreading throughout the environment, the ratio of concern level among the general public and the experts and schoalrs reduced 5.3 and 6.8 percentage points, respectively, while that among those working at the nano-related job sites swelled 28.6 percentage points. About the guarantee against safety risk offered by nano product manufacturers, the ratio of confidence level among the general public and the experts and scholars went up 13.6 and 2.4 percentages points, respectively, while that among those working at the nano-related job sites was down 1.6 percentages points. As for the media reports on nano technologies, the ratio of confidence level among the general public was similar to that of 2008, at 31.1%, while that among the experts and scholars rose 0.2 percentage points. For the government departments (such as the Environmental Protection Administration, the Department of Health, etc.) on the control of nanotechnology, the general level of trust in the proportion of the population increased by 3.2 percentage points over last year; workplace trust in the proportion of employees increased by 4.1 percentage points over last year. Trust in experts and scholars down 26.3 percentage points compared with last year. Can see that different groups for the views of nanotechnology risk perception exists a great difference.Suggested that the relevant institutions can plan a good communication measures, and to provide more education and advocacy nanotechnology research.

Nanotechnology；Risk Perception；Benefit