環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號
經費年度	110
計畫經費	7,435 千元
預算科目	加強基層環保建設-水污染防治及流域整體性環境保護
專案開始日期	2021/01/28
專案結束日期	2021/11/30
專案主持人	凃耀珽
主辦單位	屏東縣政府環境保護局
承辦人	杜知宜
執行單位	京拓環保科技有限公司
專案分類	水質保護
中文關鍵字	事業稽查、水質採樣、東港溪
英文關鍵字	Inspections on industries、Donggang River Region、II. Examination of the water samples
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	凃耀珽
計畫聯絡電話	07-9567069#
計畫聯絡信箱	fun2530990@gmail.com

中文摘要	摘要屏東縣政府環境保護局為降低東港溪流域污染惡化情形及改善河川水質情況，並杜絕非法污染源排放，以減少民眾陳情事件發生及減輕環境負荷，達到整體流域污染削減量之目標。特擬定本計畫協助環保局加強東港溪事業水污染源偷排及暗管查核作業，並全面執行東港溪流域事業單位稽查及放流水質採樣檢測作業，利用輔導及告發等方式並行，以改善流域內事業單位違法偷排行為，減少污染對環境之負荷，提升整體環境品質。本計畫自110年1月28日起執行，至110年11月30日執行成果概述如下：一、東港溪流域事業稽查 (一) 本計畫執行東港溪流域事業稽查累計已完成750家次，其中非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業共執行469家次，其次為草食性動物(牛)畜牧業共完成執行26家次稽查，其餘事業完成70家次稽查作業。 (二) 根據稽查結果顯示，查核中發現部分事業廢水處理設施狀況不理想，包含以下常見狀況，厭氣池水力停留時間不足、曝氣量池曝氣量不足、設備缺少維護等情形。 (三) 稽查執行成果共計告發102件次，違反水污法第7條(放流水未符合標準)共計41家次、第8條(未妥善儲存污泥)1家次、第14條(未依許可操作)共計2家次、第14條-1(無排放許可) 共計3家次、第18條(違反管理辦法，如設備故障、文件未紀錄)共計11家次、第18條-1 (繞流排放)1家次、第28條(疏漏)共計4 家次，裁罰金額共計2,064,374元。二、水質採樣檢測作業 (一) 本計畫規定執行150家次水質採樣檢測作業，至110年07月30日已完成協助環保局針對各事業放流水排放口水質採樣檢測分析，共計79家次。其中非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業之事業共計44家次；草食性動物(牛)畜牧業之事業共計17家次；其餘事業18家次。 (二) 79家次畜牧業放流水水質樣品分析項目包含BOD、COD、SS、pH、水溫，其它事業水質樣品共同分析項目為pH及水溫，另依事業特性分析分析不同水質項目，其放流水檢測結果，非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業合格率為41%，草食性動物(牛)畜牧業合格率為0%，其它事業不合格率僅17%；可見畜牧業廢水為東港溪流域的主要污染來源。畜牧業放流水之SS與BOD之檢出不合格率偏高，推測為廢水處理系統厭氣池水力停留時間不足，使得BOD與SS含量偏高之情形。三、廢水設施功能評鑑作業 (一)本計畫規定執行至少5件以上之功能評鑑作業，已執行完成3件功能評鑑作業初評，因應嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎疫情，暫緩辦理專學者現場複評作業，將於8月疫情解封後進行辦理複評工作。四、污染即時監測查緝本計畫運用24小時水質連續監測設備，共計查獲6家排水異常之畜牧業，於事業排水下游處予以即時連線監測，監測觀察水中濁度變化，其查獲事業中，1家非經放流口排放，4家採樣之放流水水質超出排放標準，1家未依許可操作。五、非列管事業污染源資料建置 (一) 東港溪流域非列管畜牧業共計467家次，其中養雞場最多210家，其次為養鴨(鵝)場115家，羊31家，食品工廠7家，完成更新建置畜牧業非列管地圖與數量規模資料。 (二) 東港溪流域非列管畜牧業，已針對蛋鴨場，完成8家次盤查，有8家因排放之廢水中夾雜畜禽羽毛及糞便，依水污法進行裁處。 (三) 非列管食品豆干工廠隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為1,200mg/L、COD為19,200mg/L、SS為3,500mg/L；鴨蛋工廠作業隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為311mg/L、COD為514mg/L、SS為432mg/L；畜牧內臟清洗工廠隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為117mg/L、COD為256mg/L、SS為106mg/L。
中文關鍵字	事業稽查、水質採樣、東港溪

中文摘要

摘要屏東縣政府環境保護局為降低東港溪流域污染惡化情形及改善河川水質情況，並杜絕非法污染源排放，以減少民眾陳情事件發生及減輕環境負荷，達到整體流域污染削減量之目標。特擬定本計畫協助環保局加強東港溪事業水污染源偷排及暗管查核作業，並全面執行東港溪流域事業單位稽查及放流水質採樣檢測作業，利用輔導及告發等方式並行，以改善流域內事業單位違法偷排行為，減少污染對環境之負荷，提升整體環境品質。本計畫自110年1月28日起執行，至110年11月30日執行成果概述如下：一、東港溪流域事業稽查 (一) 本計畫執行東港溪流域事業稽查累計已完成750家次，其中非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業共執行469家次，其次為草食性動物(牛)畜牧業共完成執行26家次稽查，其餘事業完成70家次稽查作業。 (二) 根據稽查結果顯示，查核中發現部分事業廢水處理設施狀況不理想，包含以下常見狀況，厭氣池水力停留時間不足、曝氣量池曝氣量不足、設備缺少維護等情形。 (三) 稽查執行成果共計告發102件次，違反水污法第7條(放流水未符合標準)共計41家次、第8條(未妥善儲存污泥)1家次、第14條(未依許可操作)共計2家次、第14條-1(無排放許可) 共計3家次、第18條(違反管理辦法，如設備故障、文件未紀錄)共計11家次、第18條-1 (繞流排放)1家次、第28條(疏漏)共計4 家次，裁罰金額共計2,064,374元。二、水質採樣檢測作業 (一) 本計畫規定執行150家次水質採樣檢測作業，至110年07月30日已完成協助環保局針對各事業放流水排放口水質採樣檢測分析，共計79家次。其中非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業之事業共計44家次；草食性動物(牛)畜牧業之事業共計17家次；其餘事業18家次。 (二) 79家次畜牧業放流水水質樣品分析項目包含BOD、COD、SS、pH、水溫，其它事業水質樣品共同分析項目為pH及水溫，另依事業特性分析分析不同水質項目，其放流水檢測結果，非草食性動物(豬)畜牧業合格率為41%，草食性動物(牛)畜牧業合格率為0%，其它事業不合格率僅17%；可見畜牧業廢水為東港溪流域的主要污染來源。畜牧業放流水之SS與BOD之檢出不合格率偏高，推測為廢水處理系統厭氣池水力停留時間不足，使得BOD與SS含量偏高之情形。三、廢水設施功能評鑑作業 (一)本計畫規定執行至少5件以上之功能評鑑作業，已執行完成3件功能評鑑作業初評，因應嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎疫情，暫緩辦理專學者現場複評作業，將於8月疫情解封後進行辦理複評工作。四、污染即時監測查緝本計畫運用24小時水質連續監測設備，共計查獲6家排水異常之畜牧業，於事業排水下游處予以即時連線監測，監測觀察水中濁度變化，其查獲事業中，1家非經放流口排放，4家採樣之放流水水質超出排放標準，1家未依許可操作。五、非列管事業污染源資料建置 (一) 東港溪流域非列管畜牧業共計467家次，其中養雞場最多210家，其次為養鴨(鵝)場115家，羊31家，食品工廠7家，完成更新建置畜牧業非列管地圖與數量規模資料。 (二) 東港溪流域非列管畜牧業，已針對蛋鴨場，完成8家次盤查，有8家因排放之廢水中夾雜畜禽羽毛及糞便，依水污法進行裁處。 (三) 非列管食品豆干工廠隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為1,200mg/L、COD為19,200mg/L、SS為3,500mg/L；鴨蛋工廠作業隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為311mg/L、COD為514mg/L、SS為432mg/L；畜牧內臟清洗工廠隨機採樣一次之作業廢水，BOD為117mg/L、COD為256mg/L、SS為106mg/L。

中文關鍵字

事業稽查、水質採樣、東港溪

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	110東港溪稽查計畫期末報告.pdf	16MB		2023/3/8 上午 12:00:00

摘要	Abstract To reduce the deterioration of contamination in Donggang River and improve the water quality by eliminating illegal pollution discharge while aiming at three objectives: reducing public complaints, reforming the environment and overall diminishing the regional pollution, Environmental Protection Bureau of Pingtung County Government has drafted this project to enhance the examination of unauthorized wastewater discharge and pipelines in Donggang River, while thoroughly inspecting the industries located in the area and testing the water samples collected. With guidance and flagging simultaneously executed, the authority is dedicated to stop the illegal waste discharged by the businesses, scale down the pollution and improve the environment on a larger scale. The project started on January 22, 2020, and below is the summary of the achievement till November 30, 2020: I. Inspections on industries in the Donggang River Region a. 750 inspections have been completed, of which 618 were on non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries, 37 were on herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries and 95 on the other businesses. b. According to the inspection results, some of the wastewater treatment facilities were not ideal, with problems such as: insufficient remaining time in the anaerobic tanks, insufficient aeration in the aeration tanks and inadequate repairment of facilities…etc. c. The inspections resulted in 102 flagging operations, including 71 violations of article 7, 5 of article 14, 2 of article 18, 17 of article 28, Water Pollution Control Measures Regulations, and 6 violations of article 27, Waste Disposal Act. The total fine has summed up as 2,644,487 NTD. II. Examination of the water samples a. This project required 150 collection and testing on water samples. Until November 30, 2020, 161 samples collected from the discharging pipeline have been examined, including 108 non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries, 17 herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries and 36 on the other businesses. b. The samples of 125 husbandries were analyzed on objectives including BOD, COD, SS, pH value and temperature. The other businesses were all tested on pH value and temperature, while various objectives were tested given the different natures of the industries. As the result, the passing rate of non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries was 37% and the herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries 0%, while the other industries held a mere 5% rate of failure rate, which led to a conclusion that husbandries were the main source of pollution in the Donggang River region. The failure rate of SS and BOD was especially high, a result caused by insufficient remaining time in anaerobic tanks in the wastewater treatment facilities. III. Examination on the wastewater treatment facility functions a. This project required at least 5 examinations on facility functions. 5 inspections have been completed, each time conducted and advised by 2 experts/scholars. b. The list of names was selected according to irregular water disposal and treatment, waste sludge production (allowed difference rate considered) and businesses that have violated the regulations in recent years. c. In the opinion of the experts/scholars, the business owners were advised to improve their facility and provide the authority with their plans. 3 of which have been reviewed for their progress. IV. Instant surveillance and investigation on pollution a. A 24-hour water quality surveillance system is applied to this project. Irregular wastewater disposal from 9 husbandries were detected and monitored at the downstream of where the businesses were located in order to observe the turbidity changes of the water. Among the 9 businesses, 2 have failed to discharge wastewater via the discharging pipelines, while 5 have disposed wastewater 5 times more contaminated than the standard regulation. V. Establishment of non-listed industrial pollution source database a. In the Donggang River region, there were 467 non-listed husbandries, including 215 chicken farms, 220 duck/goose farms, 31 sheep farms and 1 horse farm. The map and statistic database of these non-listed husbandries have been updated. b. Among the non-listed husbandries in the Donggang River region, 31 duck/goose farms located in the most polluted area were inspected, while 5 of which were fined due to disposal of wastewater contaminated by feathers and feces. c. The wastewater of the operational process of a non-listed tofu-skin factory was collected as a random sample. The test result was listed as followed: pH value 5.9, temperature 38.8℃, BOD 1,630 mg/L, COD 4,180 mg/L, SS 356 mg/L. The wastewater of the cleansing process of a dried tofu factory was also collected once, with a pH value of 9.9, temperature 27.1℃, BOD 311 mg/L, COD 631 mg/L and SS 92.0 mg/L.
英文關鍵字	Inspections on industries、Donggang River Region、II. Examination of the water samples

摘要

Abstract To reduce the deterioration of contamination in Donggang River and improve the water quality by eliminating illegal pollution discharge while aiming at three objectives: reducing public complaints, reforming the environment and overall diminishing the regional pollution, Environmental Protection Bureau of Pingtung County Government has drafted this project to enhance the examination of unauthorized wastewater discharge and pipelines in Donggang River, while thoroughly inspecting the industries located in the area and testing the water samples collected. With guidance and flagging simultaneously executed, the authority is dedicated to stop the illegal waste discharged by the businesses, scale down the pollution and improve the environment on a larger scale. The project started on January 22, 2020, and below is the summary of the achievement till November 30, 2020: I. Inspections on industries in the Donggang River Region a. 750 inspections have been completed, of which 618 were on non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries, 37 were on herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries and 95 on the other businesses. b. According to the inspection results, some of the wastewater treatment facilities were not ideal, with problems such as: insufficient remaining time in the anaerobic tanks, insufficient aeration in the aeration tanks and inadequate repairment of facilities…etc. c. The inspections resulted in 102 flagging operations, including 71 violations of article 7, 5 of article 14, 2 of article 18, 17 of article 28, Water Pollution Control Measures Regulations, and 6 violations of article 27, Waste Disposal Act. The total fine has summed up as 2,644,487 NTD. II. Examination of the water samples a. This project required 150 collection and testing on water samples. Until November 30, 2020, 161 samples collected from the discharging pipeline have been examined, including 108 non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries, 17 herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries and 36 on the other businesses. b. The samples of 125 husbandries were analyzed on objectives including BOD, COD, SS, pH value and temperature. The other businesses were all tested on pH value and temperature, while various objectives were tested given the different natures of the industries. As the result, the passing rate of non-herbivorous-animal (pigs) husbandries was 37% and the herbivorous-animal (cows) husbandries 0%, while the other industries held a mere 5% rate of failure rate, which led to a conclusion that husbandries were the main source of pollution in the Donggang River region. The failure rate of SS and BOD was especially high, a result caused by insufficient remaining time in anaerobic tanks in the wastewater treatment facilities. III. Examination on the wastewater treatment facility functions a. This project required at least 5 examinations on facility functions. 5 inspections have been completed, each time conducted and advised by 2 experts/scholars. b. The list of names was selected according to irregular water disposal and treatment, waste sludge production (allowed difference rate considered) and businesses that have violated the regulations in recent years. c. In the opinion of the experts/scholars, the business owners were advised to improve their facility and provide the authority with their plans. 3 of which have been reviewed for their progress. IV. Instant surveillance and investigation on pollution a. A 24-hour water quality surveillance system is applied to this project. Irregular wastewater disposal from 9 husbandries were detected and monitored at the downstream of where the businesses were located in order to observe the turbidity changes of the water. Among the 9 businesses, 2 have failed to discharge wastewater via the discharging pipelines, while 5 have disposed wastewater 5 times more contaminated than the standard regulation. V. Establishment of non-listed industrial pollution source database a. In the Donggang River region, there were 467 non-listed husbandries, including 215 chicken farms, 220 duck/goose farms, 31 sheep farms and 1 horse farm. The map and statistic database of these non-listed husbandries have been updated. b. Among the non-listed husbandries in the Donggang River region, 31 duck/goose farms located in the most polluted area were inspected, while 5 of which were fined due to disposal of wastewater contaminated by feathers and feces. c. The wastewater of the operational process of a non-listed tofu-skin factory was collected as a random sample. The test result was listed as followed: pH value 5.9, temperature 38.8℃, BOD 1,630 mg/L, COD 4,180 mg/L, SS 356 mg/L. The wastewater of the cleansing process of a dried tofu factory was also collected once, with a pH value of 9.9, temperature 27.1℃, BOD 311 mg/L, COD 631 mg/L and SS 92.0 mg/L.

英文關鍵字

Inspections on industries、Donggang River Region、II. Examination of the water samples