環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-99-HA14-03-A191
經費年度	099
計畫經費	4,490 千元
專案開始日期	2010/08/13
專案結束日期	2011/06/30
專案主持人	蔡永興
主辦單位	回收基管會
承辦人	阮儀芳
執行單位	晶淨科技股份有限公司
專案分類	廢棄物管理
中文關鍵字	資源回收;資源回收績效考核;平時資料查核
英文關鍵字	Recycling;Assess Efficiency;Inspection of daily data
協同主持人	黃仁志
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	吳佩璇
計畫聯絡電話	02-25790020#208
計畫聯絡信箱	leominami@eco-tec.com.tw

中文摘要	資源回收工作及補助審查相關工作方面：99年度經常性經費，各縣市陸續提出經費申請，未能於99年底完成請款及撥款作業者，導致當年度經費無法如期完成之環保局將影響其101年度經費補助之分配；而購置機具及施作工程部分統計至今，資源回收車兩階段共補助3-3.9噸79輛、6-6.9噸138輛，共計218輛；貯存場部分興建5座、整建36座；相關機具24件。本計畫亦不定期彙整各執行機關提報之資源回收成果統計表以供參考，及持續更新執行機關資源回收設施（含回收車、貯存場）設置現況資料。100年度補助計畫全數縣市已審查完成，截至期末報告期程，除新北市、嘉義縣、臺東縣、連江縣外均已撥付第一期款；購置機具及施作工程部分則撥付相關機具1件，本計畫亦持續協助辦理後續審核及撥補等相關工作；另已協助環保署辦理北(宜蘭縣)、中(嘉義縣)、南(屏東縣)三區資源回收研討會相關工作。辦理全國執行機關資源回收工作績效考核：本計畫為強化執行機關資源回收成效資料正確性及公平性，99年度平時資料輔導計畫已於該年10月至11月至各環保局實地進行資料輔導工作，同時加強與地方溝通了解其實際執行的方式，本計畫並協助彙整受輔導縣市輔導紀錄以評定平時資料輔導成績；另99年度推動執行機關加強辦理資源回收績效考核計畫，已於100年3月1日至100年4月20日辦理完成，本計畫於考核執行期間協助考核手冊製作、委員行程安排等工作外，亦於考核工作結束後協助彙整考核委員意見，並協助辦理考核決選會議及頒獎典禮等相關事宜。輔導資源回收率偏低縣市方面：本計畫之輔導工作之對象為98年度整體資源回收率未達26.4%(目標回收率33%之百分之八十)，且每人每日垃圾清運量高於0.5kg之縣市，即嘉義縣（24.28%）、屏東縣（23.6%）、雲林縣（20.66%）三縣市，再從選定其98年度資源回收率最低之2鄉鎮市，作為本計畫進行輔導及訪查對象，於計畫執行期間上述三縣市每季辦理電話或現場訪談1次，並隨車觀察鄉鎮清潔隊之資源回收收運及民眾回收分類情況，在本計畫輔導過程中可發現具有通案性問題造成績效較差，例如：人員異動頻繁、數據資料收集彙整不齊全、因民眾生活習慣不同導致資源回收量偏低等，本計畫亦因地制宜提供建議作法或其他縣市績優作法以供參考，而99年度此三縣市之資源回收率皆有大幅成長，即嘉義縣29.07%、屏東縣27.48%、雲林24.96%，且雲林縣及嘉義縣分別獲得99年度推動執行機關加強辦資源回收工作績效考核第二組、第三組織最佳進步獎。建立資源回收車輛共同供應契約集中採購規範:本計畫已協助彙整各縣市環保局之意見納入「100年度資源回收車共同供契約集中採購規範」中，並轉由台灣銀行辦理後續招標事宜，並協助後續相關資料核對等相關工作。
中文關鍵字	資源回收;資源回收績效考核;平時資料查核

中文摘要

資源回收工作及補助審查相關工作方面：99年度經常性經費，各縣市陸續提出經費申請，未能於99年底完成請款及撥款作業者，導致當年度經費無法如期完成之環保局將影響其101年度經費補助之分配；而購置機具及施作工程部分統計至今，資源回收車兩階段共補助3-3.9噸79輛、6-6.9噸138輛，共計218輛；貯存場部分興建5座、整建36座；相關機具24件。本計畫亦不定期彙整各執行機關提報之資源回收成果統計表以供參考，及持續更新執行機關資源回收設施（含回收車、貯存場）設置現況資料。100年度補助計畫全數縣市已審查完成，截至期末報告期程，除新北市、嘉義縣、臺東縣、連江縣外均已撥付第一期款；購置機具及施作工程部分則撥付相關機具1件，本計畫亦持續協助辦理後續審核及撥補等相關工作；另已協助環保署辦理北(宜蘭縣)、中(嘉義縣)、南(屏東縣)三區資源回收研討會相關工作。辦理全國執行機關資源回收工作績效考核：本計畫為強化執行機關資源回收成效資料正確性及公平性，99年度平時資料輔導計畫已於該年10月至11月至各環保局實地進行資料輔導工作，同時加強與地方溝通了解其實際執行的方式，本計畫並協助彙整受輔導縣市輔導紀錄以評定平時資料輔導成績；另99年度推動執行機關加強辦理資源回收績效考核計畫，已於100年3月1日至100年4月20日辦理完成，本計畫於考核執行期間協助考核手冊製作、委員行程安排等工作外，亦於考核工作結束後協助彙整考核委員意見，並協助辦理考核決選會議及頒獎典禮等相關事宜。輔導資源回收率偏低縣市方面：本計畫之輔導工作之對象為98年度整體資源回收率未達26.4%(目標回收率33%之百分之八十)，且每人每日垃圾清運量高於0.5kg之縣市，即嘉義縣（24.28%）、屏東縣（23.6%）、雲林縣（20.66%）三縣市，再從選定其98年度資源回收率最低之2鄉鎮市，作為本計畫進行輔導及訪查對象，於計畫執行期間上述三縣市每季辦理電話或現場訪談1次，並隨車觀察鄉鎮清潔隊之資源回收收運及民眾回收分類情況，在本計畫輔導過程中可發現具有通案性問題造成績效較差，例如：人員異動頻繁、數據資料收集彙整不齊全、因民眾生活習慣不同導致資源回收量偏低等，本計畫亦因地制宜提供建議作法或其他縣市績優作法以供參考，而99年度此三縣市之資源回收率皆有大幅成長，即嘉義縣29.07%、屏東縣27.48%、雲林24.96%，且雲林縣及嘉義縣分別獲得99年度推動執行機關加強辦資源回收工作績效考核第二組、第三組織最佳進步獎。建立資源回收車輛共同供應契約集中採購規範:本計畫已協助彙整各縣市環保局之意見納入「100年度資源回收車共同供契約集中採購規範」中，並轉由台灣銀行辦理後續招標事宜，並協助後續相關資料核對等相關工作。

中文關鍵字

資源回收;資源回收績效考核;平時資料查核

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	EPA99HA1403A191.pdf	25MB	期末報告全文	2011/11/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	Auditing recycling and subsidizing related work: Any city or county environmental protection bureaus that applied for fund subsidy in year 2010, but failed to fulfill payment request and money appropriation and caused the fund unfulfilled will face the consequence of subsidy review in year 2012. Up to now, the mechanical equipment bought and construction work accomplished are: Seventy-nine 3 - 3.9 tons recycling trucks, one hundred and thirty 6 - 6.9 tons trucks, total 218 trucks; Five built and thirty-six maintained storage yards; and twenty four related mechanical equipment. This project also included compiling statistics reports of recycling result received irregularly from each organization, and continued to update present status of recycling facilities (including recycling trucks and storage yards). The subsidy plan of year 2011 for all the cities and counties had been audited. So far all the fund of the first stage had been released except for New Taipei City, Chiayi County, Taitung County and Lienchiang County to procure one mechanical instrument and executing construction projects. This project also continued to assist following-up auditing and subsidizing related work. In addition all the work involved in assisting the Environmental Protection Bureau to organize seminars on recycling in northern (Yilan County), central (Chiayi County) and southern (Pingdong County) areas was accomplished, too. Conducting efficiency assessment on recycling executed by all the government organizations in the country: To reinforce executing the effect of recycling, the information guided project of year 2010 was executed in October and November at every Environmental Protection Bureau, and at the same time the communication with the local organizations was enhanced to recognize their way of operation. The project also helped the counseled cities and counties to compile counseling record to assess their documentation performance. Furthermore, we helped all the organizations strengthen their recycling effect accountability and it was done from March 1st, 2011 to April 20th, 2011. We also assisted them to produce assessment pamphlets during that period, arrange itinerary for committee members, compile opinions from members after the assessment was over, and assist to organize assessment voting meetings and Award Presenting Ceremonies, etc. Counseling cities and counties whose recycling rate is low: In this project the parties to be counseled were cities and counties whose recycling rate was lower than 26.4% in year 2009 (80% of recycling target rate 33%), and garbage produced per person per day is higher than 0.5 kg, i.e. Chiayi County (24.28%), Pingtong County (23.6%), and Yunlin County (20.66%) three counties. Then two towns that had the lowest recycling rate in year 2009 were chosen to visit, investigate and counsel. During the period a phone interview or a face-to-face interview were done every season for the said three counties, and specialists were sent to accompany the cleaning crew to observe the recycling operation and how the citizens categorized the recycling goods. Along the counseling process, a common situation that caused lower efficiency accountability was found, i.e. high staff turn-over rate, incomplete compilation of fiscal information, different living styles that resulted in lower recycling rate, etc. Suggestions were provided in accordance with local conditions, or better methods employed by other cities or counties were offered for their reference. As a result, the recycling rate of these three counties was highly raised; Chiayi reached 29.07%, Pingtong 27.48%, and Yunlin 24.96%; in addition Yunlin County and Chiayi county received the Most Improved Award of the 2nd and the 3rd category of recycling efficiency accountability for year 2010 among participating organizations. Build up a standard congregated procurement policy of Recycling trucks Provision Contract: All the suggestions from Environmental Protection Bureaus of all the cities and counties were collected and included in the “Standard congregated procurement policy of Recycling trucks Provision contract for year 2011”, and Taiwan Bank was delegated to conduct the follow-up bid activities and assist information-checking related work.
英文關鍵字	Recycling;Assess Efficiency;Inspection of daily data

摘要

Auditing recycling and subsidizing related work: Any city or county environmental protection bureaus that applied for fund subsidy in year 2010, but failed to fulfill payment request and money appropriation and caused the fund unfulfilled will face the consequence of subsidy review in year 2012. Up to now, the mechanical equipment bought and construction work accomplished are: Seventy-nine 3 - 3.9 tons recycling trucks, one hundred and thirty 6 - 6.9 tons trucks, total 218 trucks; Five built and thirty-six maintained storage yards; and twenty four related mechanical equipment. This project also included compiling statistics reports of recycling result received irregularly from each organization, and continued to update present status of recycling facilities (including recycling trucks and storage yards). The subsidy plan of year 2011 for all the cities and counties had been audited. So far all the fund of the first stage had been released except for New Taipei City, Chiayi County, Taitung County and Lienchiang County to procure one mechanical instrument and executing construction projects. This project also continued to assist following-up auditing and subsidizing related work. In addition all the work involved in assisting the Environmental Protection Bureau to organize seminars on recycling in northern (Yilan County), central (Chiayi County) and southern (Pingdong County) areas was accomplished, too. Conducting efficiency assessment on recycling executed by all the government organizations in the country: To reinforce executing the effect of recycling, the information guided project of year 2010 was executed in October and November at every Environmental Protection Bureau, and at the same time the communication with the local organizations was enhanced to recognize their way of operation. The project also helped the counseled cities and counties to compile counseling record to assess their documentation performance. Furthermore, we helped all the organizations strengthen their recycling effect accountability and it was done from March 1st, 2011 to April 20th, 2011. We also assisted them to produce assessment pamphlets during that period, arrange itinerary for committee members, compile opinions from members after the assessment was over, and assist to organize assessment voting meetings and Award Presenting Ceremonies, etc. Counseling cities and counties whose recycling rate is low: In this project the parties to be counseled were cities and counties whose recycling rate was lower than 26.4% in year 2009 (80% of recycling target rate 33%), and garbage produced per person per day is higher than 0.5 kg, i.e. Chiayi County (24.28%), Pingtong County (23.6%), and Yunlin County (20.66%) three counties. Then two towns that had the lowest recycling rate in year 2009 were chosen to visit, investigate and counsel. During the period a phone interview or a face-to-face interview were done every season for the said three counties, and specialists were sent to accompany the cleaning crew to observe the recycling operation and how the citizens categorized the recycling goods. Along the counseling process, a common situation that caused lower efficiency accountability was found, i.e. high staff turn-over rate, incomplete compilation of fiscal information, different living styles that resulted in lower recycling rate, etc. Suggestions were provided in accordance with local conditions, or better methods employed by other cities or counties were offered for their reference. As a result, the recycling rate of these three counties was highly raised; Chiayi reached 29.07%, Pingtong 27.48%, and Yunlin 24.96%; in addition Yunlin County and Chiayi county received the Most Improved Award of the 2nd and the 3rd category of recycling efficiency accountability for year 2010 among participating organizations. Build up a standard congregated procurement policy of Recycling trucks Provision Contract: All the suggestions from Environmental Protection Bureaus of all the cities and counties were collected and included in the “Standard congregated procurement policy of Recycling trucks Provision contract for year 2011”, and Taiwan Bank was delegated to conduct the follow-up bid activities and assist information-checking related work.

英文關鍵字

Recycling;Assess Efficiency;Inspection of daily data