EPA-106-FA12-13-A147

106

10,080 千元

固定污染源管制

2017/03/29

2017/12/31

陳辰菖

空保處

郭愛華

環興科技股份有限公司

大氣空氣

空氣污染防制費、經濟誘因、季節費率

Air Pollution Control Fee, Economic Incentive, Seasonal Fee

林婉琪

07-5372606#8511

wanchi@mail.sinotech.com.tw

本計畫主要配合環保署針對空污費制度、排放係數與排放量確認等方面進行規劃研擬相關策略包括經濟誘因評析、本土化排放係數修訂及稽核輔導檢討等相關成果如下： 一、研擬推動經濟誘因之空污費制度，提高固定污染源空氣污染減量意願。 為持續配合空氣品質改善，在經濟誘因方面，研擬第二階段粒狀物徵收作業，以實際排放量徵收非屬營建工程之固定污染源空污費。粒狀物徵收預估金額最終方案，粒狀物(含懸浮微粒)徵收金額約13.7億元，其中有害物種空污費為681萬元。 由於空氣品質分析結果顯示秋冬季節為主要空品不良之季節，為鼓勵公私場所於空品不良季節降載，環保署自民國105年著手評估秋動季節調升現行空污費公告費率，經公聽研商會及多次開會討論修正，已於民國106年5月31日修正公告，其內容將調高秋冬季節費率(第一季及第四季)，然季排放量較前三年相同季別之平均排放量低於90%者，空污費適用原費率之優惠規定；減量更多者，可再享有8折優惠，或透過防制設備效率提升，享有4~8折優惠係數等雙重優惠，期藉經濟誘因方式，鼓勵自願降載，降低污染排放。 為鼓勵公私場所裝設防制設備或提升防制設備處理效率，環保署於民國97年度公布「公私場所固定污染源空氣污染防制設備空氣污染防制費減免辦法」，建議修正申請期程規定以及耗材減免費額引用條件，可確實鼓勵公私場所致力於污染防制減量作業。 環境政策與開發計畫案之間的環境成本與環境效益實為一體二面的關係，在開發案中，常會因污染排放而帶來環境外部成本。因此，在規劃收費制度環境政策之效益時，即政策實施前後的環境外部成本之差做為效益之衡量，進行健康成本分析評估，平均每年空污費制度所帶來的健康效益為16.1億元。 二、建置揮發性有機物本土化係數，有效追蹤污染來源，進行減量改善。 有關塑膠製品製造業本土化係數建置方面，可發現多數許可證針對射(押)出成型設備並未要求其收集及處理VOCs，可知其實際排放量並不高，估算排放係數為0.122 公斤-VOCs/公噸-產品。 有關積體電路製造程序本土化係數建置方面，可知積體電路皆屬於管道密閉收集系統至沸石濃縮加蓄熱式焚化處理，應可依排放管道結果計算排放量；可依不同產品修正分析排放係數，包括晶圓(4.035 公斤-VOCs/公噸-產品)、IC(1.574 公斤-VOCs/公噸-產品)與DRAM(8.985 公斤-VOCs/公噸-產品)等訂定不同排放係數。 有關液晶顯示器製造程序本土化係數建置方面，係由公會所提出，考量全廠排放管道檢測數據進行加權計算。經審查核定排放係數以5.5世代做為區隔，排放係數分別訂定為0.03826 kg/m2-投入量(5.5世代以上)及0.07080 kg/m2-投入量(小於5.5世代)。 三、評鑑及考核縣市執行空氣污染物排放量審查作業，提升審查作業品質。 為確保地方環保局審查品質，共修正膠帶業製造程序、液晶顯示器製造程序、汽車表面塗裝程序、積體電路製造程序及塑膠品製造程序等5個製程審查技術手冊，提供其執行空污費審查輔助參考工具。 配合環保署民國106至107年度考評規範，協助環保署掌握地方環保局空污費徵收制度執行情形，完成30場次公私場所現場查核，有效提升地方環保局查核品質，以及針對現行計量問題提出建議。 在強化監督查核作業方面，完成共計5個縣市合計50件空污費案件查驗與監督作業，確保整個空污費外稽制度品質，提升縣市審查人員素質與專業能力。

空氣污染防制費、經濟誘因、季節費率

固定污染源空氣污染防制費徵收制度、排放係數檢討暨稽核計畫(EPA106FA1213A147).pdf

6MB

固定污染源空氣污染防制費徵收制度、排放係數檢討暨稽核計畫(EPA106FA1213A147)

2018/5/1 上午 12:00:00

The project mainly supports the EPA's plan for the Air Pollution Control Fee, emission coefficient emissions confirm, and other relevant policies including economic incentives assessment, revision of localized emission coefficient and audit of guidance review. The main results are listed as the following. First, plans for the next phase of the Air Pollution Control Fee was drawn to provide economic incentives to increase the willingness to reduce air pollution from stationary sources. In order to keep improving the air quality, the EPA planned the second-phase fee collection scheme on particulate pollutions to provide further economic incentives. In the plan, whose with actual emission measurements will be charge based According to the characteristics of pollution emissions and the sources of pollution fees on non-construction projects for the Air Pollution Control Fee from stationary sources. The final amount collected fee for the Air Pollution Control Fee of Total Suspended Particulates(TSP) is about 1.37 billion. The air pollution fees of harmful species for the two programs are 6.81 million. As the air quality analysis showed that autumn and winter were the main season for poor air quality, in order to encourage public and private places to reduce the emission in unfavorable seasons, the EPA started to assess to raise the fee in autumn and winter. After many public hearings and meetings, the official announcement to raise the fee in autumn and winter season was made on May 31, 2017. However, if the season emission is less 10% off than the average of the past three years, the original rate can be used. Those with more emission reduction, 20% discount will be given; or 20 to 60% discount will be given to those who improve their control equipments. The EPA hope to encourage the factories to reduce the pollution emissions voluntarily by the way of economic incentives In order to encourage the public and private places to install control equipment or to enhance the efficiency of control equipment, the EPA announced that "the Measures of Reduction for Air Pollution Prevention Equipment of Stationary Sources in Public and Private Places" in 2008. We suggested to modification the requirement of application period and reduce the condition of the supplies fee so that public and private places will be dedicated to reduce the pollution. Environmental costs and environmental benefits between environmental policies and development plans are one-sided relationship. Therefore, when planning the effectiveness of the environmental policy of the charging system, the average annual health benefit from the air pollution fee system is 1.61 billion. Second, the development of localized coefficients of volatile organic compounds, effective tracking of sources of pollution, reduction and improvement. Regarding the establishment of the localization factor for the manufacturing of plastic products, most of the permits that were not required to collect and process VOCs for the injection molding equipment. Therefore, the actual emissions were not high. The estimate of the emission factor is 0.122 kg-VOCs / ton-product. Regarding the building of localization coefficient of integrated circuit manufacturing process, we can see that all integrated circuits are pipeline confined collection system to zeolite concentration plus regenerative incineration. The emission should be calculated according to the result of pipelines. The emission coefficient could be set according to different products, includes the wafer (4.035 kg-VOCs / metric ton-product), IC (1.574 kg-VOCs / metric ton-product) and DRAM (8.985 kg- VOCs / metric ton- product). The localization coefficient of LCD manufacturing procedures is provided by the Business Guild and considering the pipeline inspection from entire plant emission to make weighted calculation, the final emission coefficient is decided by generation. After the generations of 5.5, the estimated of emission coefficient is 0.03826 kg - VOCs / m2 – Inputs, otherwise the estimated of emission coefficient is 0.07080 kg - VOCs / m2 – Inputs. Third, assess the County and City air pollutant emissions audit exercises to enhance their quality. In order to ensure the quality of the local EPB’s audit, a total of 5 audit manuals on manufactures were drafted, including tape manufacturing, LCD manufacturing, automotive surface coating, integrated circuit manufacturing and plastic manufacturing to provide the reference tools for the audit of the air pollution fee. In line with the assessment criteria during the period from 2017 to 2018, we assisted EPBs to control the collect situation of the air pollution fee and finished on-site verifications of 30 times on public and private sites to improve the review quality and gave advices. In terms of strengthening supervision and checking, inspection and supervision of 50 air pollution cases were completed in 5 counties, to ensure the quality of the entire air pollution fee and improve the ability of the auditors.

Air Pollution Control Fee, Economic Incentive, Seasonal Fee