環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-97-H101-02-111
經費年度	097
計畫經費	4,550 千元
專案開始日期	2008/12/31
專案結束日期	2009/12/31
專案主持人	朱宏毅
主辦單位	廢管處
承辦人	邱俊雄
執行單位	財團法人台灣產業服務基金會
專案分類	廢棄物管理
中文關鍵字	資源回收成本；資源回收工作效率指標；廢電機電子產品流向
英文關鍵字	Resource recycle costs；Performance indicators for resource recycling；Waste electrical appliances flows
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	孫偉碩
計畫聯絡電話	02-23525233#
計畫聯絡信箱	edwinsun@ftis.org.tw

中文摘要	本計畫目的在調查執行機關資源回收工作之成本及經濟效益，藉以研訂執行機關資源回收工作效率指標，並調查執行機關廢電機電子產品回收及再利用流向，以評估其環境污染風險。本計畫依比例配置原則，再隨機抽樣57個執行機關進行現場訪查資源回收工作成本及及廢電機電子產品流向。調查結果顯示，57個執行機關執行資源回收之成本平均約3500萬/年，而其中人事成本所佔比例最高。另分三個層面研擬執行機關資源回收工作效率指標，包含(1)實績指標、(2)效率指標及(3)財務永續性指標，實績指標操作容易，但過於重視單位人力投入的影響，成本效率與技術效率可兼顧整體投入產出之資源配置，但操作不易。而執行機關大都僅分類廢電機電子產品後賣給回收商，公告應回收之廢電機電子產品大部分最終流向合格之處理廠，但非屬公告應回收之廢電機電子產品流向則較不明確，尤其是電線及電路板等除進入處理廠外，多流向不明個體戶或是出口處理，因不確定性增高故使環境污染風險提高，藉由加強追踨廢電機電子產品之再利用流向，可減少管理上的死角。
中文關鍵字	資源回收成本；資源回收工作效率指標；廢電機電子產品流向

中文摘要

本計畫目的在調查執行機關資源回收工作之成本及經濟效益，藉以研訂執行機關資源回收工作效率指標，並調查執行機關廢電機電子產品回收及再利用流向，以評估其環境污染風險。本計畫依比例配置原則，再隨機抽樣57個執行機關進行現場訪查資源回收工作成本及及廢電機電子產品流向。調查結果顯示，57個執行機關執行資源回收之成本平均約3500萬/年，而其中人事成本所佔比例最高。另分三個層面研擬執行機關資源回收工作效率指標，包含(1)實績指標、(2)效率指標及(3)財務永續性指標，實績指標操作容易，但過於重視單位人力投入的影響，成本效率與技術效率可兼顧整體投入產出之資源配置，但操作不易。而執行機關大都僅分類廢電機電子產品後賣給回收商，公告應回收之廢電機電子產品大部分最終流向合格之處理廠，但非屬公告應回收之廢電機電子產品流向則較不明確，尤其是電線及電路板等除進入處理廠外，多流向不明個體戶或是出口處理，因不確定性增高故使環境污染風險提高，藉由加強追踨廢電機電子產品之再利用流向，可減少管理上的死角。

中文關鍵字

資源回收成本；資源回收工作效率指標；廢電機電子產品流向

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	97年度執行機關資源回收成本及回收物再利用流向調查報告(公開版).pdf	6MB		2010/3/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The objectives of this project included (1) to investigate resource recycling costs and economic benefits of implementing agencies, (2) to develop performance indicators for resource recycling, (3) to access environmental pollution risk through investigating waste electrical appliances flows. Based on proportional allocation, this project randomly sampled 57 implementing agencies and then conducted on-site investigations on resource recycle costs and the flows of waste electrical appliances. According to the results of our survey, the average resource recycling costs of an implementing agency was about NT$35,000,000 per year and personnel costs had the highest ratio. Furthermore, indicators for evaluating recycling performance of implementing agencies were divided into three parts, including (1) recycling performance indicators, (2) recycling efficiency indicators and (3) financial sustainability indicators. Although they were easy to conduct, recycling performance indicators tended to attach too much weight to labor inputs. Recycling efficiency indicators, on the contrary, considered the overall resource allocation of inputs and outputs at the same time but difficult to conduct. In addition, most of the implementing agencies just sorted electrical appliances out without dismantling them before selling to recycling manufacturers. Although waste electrical appliances announced for recycling were usually sent to legal treatment plants, the flows of non-announced ones were uncertain. Waste wire and printed circuit board, in particular, were sent to illegal plants or exported abroad. With the rise of this uncertainty, the risk of environmental pollution becomes even greater. Therefore, we suggested trace how the electrical appliances get re-used in order to reducing dead spaces of the recycling management.
英文關鍵字	Resource recycle costs；Performance indicators for resource recycling；Waste electrical appliances flows

摘要

The objectives of this project included (1) to investigate resource recycling costs and economic benefits of implementing agencies, (2) to develop performance indicators for resource recycling, (3) to access environmental pollution risk through investigating waste electrical appliances flows. Based on proportional allocation, this project randomly sampled 57 implementing agencies and then conducted on-site investigations on resource recycle costs and the flows of waste electrical appliances. According to the results of our survey, the average resource recycling costs of an implementing agency was about NT$35,000,000 per year and personnel costs had the highest ratio. Furthermore, indicators for evaluating recycling performance of implementing agencies were divided into three parts, including (1) recycling performance indicators, (2) recycling efficiency indicators and (3) financial sustainability indicators. Although they were easy to conduct, recycling performance indicators tended to attach too much weight to labor inputs. Recycling efficiency indicators, on the contrary, considered the overall resource allocation of inputs and outputs at the same time but difficult to conduct. In addition, most of the implementing agencies just sorted electrical appliances out without dismantling them before selling to recycling manufacturers. Although waste electrical appliances announced for recycling were usually sent to legal treatment plants, the flows of non-announced ones were uncertain. Waste wire and printed circuit board, in particular, were sent to illegal plants or exported abroad. With the rise of this uncertainty, the risk of environmental pollution becomes even greater. Therefore, we suggested trace how the electrical appliances get re-used in order to reducing dead spaces of the recycling management.

英文關鍵字

Resource recycle costs；Performance indicators for resource recycling；Waste electrical appliances flows