環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-103-K103-02-102
經費年度	103
計畫經費	2,300 千元
專案開始日期	2014/02/19
專案結束日期	2014/12/31
專案主持人	楊基振
主辦單位	管考處
承辦人	王心緯
執行單位	台灣省環境工程技師公會
專案分類	科技計畫
中文關鍵字	簽證，查核，管理系統
英文關鍵字	certification, review, management information system
協同主持人	黃福全
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳淑梅
計畫聯絡電話	02-25550353#
計畫聯絡信箱	tpeea@seed.net.tw

中文摘要	行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「查核結果不合理或與文件內容不一致」占70%，其次為「簽證案件須演算及計算部份未留存相關文件」及「工作底稿首頁未簽署及加蓋執業圖記」各占20%，本年度執業機構查核僅1位技師出現「簽證案件未申報」。水污染現場查核最常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或不一致」占80%，「處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占50%，「操作情形或控制參數與申請文件不一致」、「質量平衡計算錯誤或不合理」、「不同製程或來源廢水未分別列出或檢測」各占25%。度固定污染源查核最常出現缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或前後不一致」占75%，「事業基本資料(大門座標、排放管道出口位置相對於大門口之座標、聯絡人及專責人員等)與現場不符或於文件中不一致」及「污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」各占38%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核最常出現之缺失為「缺污染物資料及製程污染防制資料」、「污水處理設施區內未佈點採樣」、「未敘明場址現況及用地歷史」、「未依場址先前使用狀況，即進行佈點規劃及採樣」等三項。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路資料庫提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類技術顧問公司之法制研議，協助研議與技師法、技師考試法等相關法規修正意見之彙整。
中文關鍵字	簽證，查核，管理系統

中文摘要

行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「查核結果不合理或與文件內容不一致」占70%，其次為「簽證案件須演算及計算部份未留存相關文件」及「工作底稿首頁未簽署及加蓋執業圖記」各占20%，本年度執業機構查核僅1位技師出現「簽證案件未申報」。水污染現場查核最常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或不一致」占80%，「處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占50%，「操作情形或控制參數與申請文件不一致」、「質量平衡計算錯誤或不合理」、「不同製程或來源廢水未分別列出或檢測」各占25%。度固定污染源查核最常出現缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或前後不一致」占75%，「事業基本資料(大門座標、排放管道出口位置相對於大門口之座標、聯絡人及專責人員等)與現場不符或於文件中不一致」及「污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」各占38%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核最常出現之缺失為「缺污染物資料及製程污染防制資料」、「污水處理設施區內未佈點採樣」、「未敘明場址現況及用地歷史」、「未依場址先前使用狀況，即進行佈點規劃及採樣」等三項。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路資料庫提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類技術顧問公司之法制研議，協助研議與技師法、技師考試法等相關法規修正意見之彙整。

中文關鍵字

簽證，查核，管理系統

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	成果報告A2.pdf	11MB		2015/2/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The objectives of Exective Yuan EPA’s registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certifications processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification engineers and to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operations of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points were focused on inspection of work drafts.This year the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects was "the results of review is not reasonable or not consistent with the contents of the document”, around 70%. Next on the list were “the certification case shall have calculations and no relevant documents are saved for calculations” and “the first page of the original working manuscripts did not have executed seal and signature ", around 20% each. For this year, review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that only one professional engineer has “not reported certificate case”. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defect was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 80%, followed by "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 50%. “Operation conditions or control parameters are not consistent with application document”, "mass balance calculation incorrect or unreasonable ", and “wastewater from different processes or sources are not listed separately or tested”, 25% each. The most frequent defect appeared on stationary source onsite review was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 75%. “Company basic information (gate coordinates, discharge pipe location in relation to the coordinates of the gate, contact person and professional personnel etc.) are not consistent with on site or document” and “Unreasonable design parameters and operational parameters for each processing units of the pollution control facility”, 38% each. The most frequent defects for the on site review of soil and underground water remediation certification cases were “no pollutant information and process contamination control information”, “there are no sampling points deployed and sampled inside the wastewater treatment facility”, “no current conditions of site and history of the site utilization”, carry out sampling point planning and take samples without based on the previous use conditions of the site”, etc. three items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist the evaluation of regulation development for registered professional environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant companies, the collection of comments for relevant amendments for professional engineer law, professional engineer examination law etc.
英文關鍵字	certification, review, management information system

摘要

The objectives of Exective Yuan EPA’s registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certifications processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification engineers and to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operations of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points were focused on inspection of work drafts.This year the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects was "the results of review is not reasonable or not consistent with the contents of the document”, around 70%. Next on the list were “the certification case shall have calculations and no relevant documents are saved for calculations” and “the first page of the original working manuscripts did not have executed seal and signature ", around 20% each. For this year, review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that only one professional engineer has “not reported certificate case”. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defect was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 80%, followed by "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 50%. “Operation conditions or control parameters are not consistent with application document”, "mass balance calculation incorrect or unreasonable ", and “wastewater from different processes or sources are not listed separately or tested”, 25% each. The most frequent defect appeared on stationary source onsite review was "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 75%. “Company basic information (gate coordinates, discharge pipe location in relation to the coordinates of the gate, contact person and professional personnel etc.) are not consistent with on site or document” and “Unreasonable design parameters and operational parameters for each processing units of the pollution control facility”, 38% each. The most frequent defects for the on site review of soil and underground water remediation certification cases were “no pollutant information and process contamination control information”, “there are no sampling points deployed and sampled inside the wastewater treatment facility”, “no current conditions of site and history of the site utilization”, carry out sampling point planning and take samples without based on the previous use conditions of the site”, etc. three items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist the evaluation of regulation development for registered professional environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant companies, the collection of comments for relevant amendments for professional engineer law, professional engineer examination law etc.

英文關鍵字

certification, review, management information system