環保專案成果報告查詢系統

專案計畫編號	EPA-102-K103-02-203
經費年度	102
計畫經費	2,400 千元
專案開始日期	2013/03/06
專案結束日期	2013/12/31
專案主持人	楊基振
主辦單位	管考處
承辦人	林郁婷
執行單位	台灣省環境工程技師公會
專案分類	科技計畫
中文關鍵字	簽證，查核，管理系統
英文關鍵字	certification, review, management information system;certification, review, management information system
協同主持人
共同主持人
計畫聯絡人	陳淑梅
計畫聯絡電話	02-25550353#
計畫聯絡信箱	tpeea@seed.net.tw

中文摘要	行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「工作底稿首頁未簽署及加蓋執業圖記」占30%，「工作底稿未留存」、「簽證案件須演算及計算部份未留存相關文件」及「查核結果不合理或與文件內容不一致」各占20%。水污染現場查核常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或不一致」占65%，「處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占35%，「未將原料所含污染物列入廢水水質項目」占19%。固定污染源現場查常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或前後不一致」、「申請文件中相關圖說未標示製程之設備(E)、空氣污染防制設施(A)、粉粒狀物料輸送設施接駁點(C)、堆置場(X)、儲槽(T)及排放口(P)」及「污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」各占21%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核常出現之缺失為「土壤評估調查顯示有重金屬污染，惟採樣分析未先經篩測」、「既有製程及廢水處理設施位置未列入評估調查範圍」、「未對有機物採樣分析的樣品，輔以PID/FID的篩測，以決定分析的樣品」等3項。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路資料庫提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類技術顧問公司之法制研議，協助研議與技師法、技師考試法等相關法規修正意見之彙整，必要時，協助因應立法院提出相關議案，研提對案相關資料。
中文關鍵字	簽證，查核，管理系統

中文摘要

行政院環境保護署辦理環工技師簽證案件查核，其目的在於了解簽證技師之簽證品質及缺失情形，進而督促簽證技師改進，以提升環工技師簽證品質，另自95年度起開始執行技師執業機構查核，查核重點為工作底稿。本年度執業機構查核最常出現之缺失為「工作底稿首頁未簽署及加蓋執業圖記」占30%，「工作底稿未留存」、「簽證案件須演算及計算部份未留存相關文件」及「查核結果不合理或與文件內容不一致」各占20%。水污染現場查核常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或不一致」占65%，「處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」占35%，「未將原料所含污染物列入廢水水質項目」占19%。固定污染源現場查常出現之缺失為「申請文件中文字及數值未填，填錯或前後不一致」、「申請文件中相關圖說未標示製程之設備(E)、空氣污染防制設施(A)、粉粒狀物料輸送設施接駁點(C)、堆置場(X)、儲槽(T)及排放口(P)」及「污染防制設施各處理單元設計參數及操作參數不合理」各占21%。土壤及地下水污染整治簽證案件現場查核常出現之缺失為「土壤評估調查顯示有重金屬污染，惟採樣分析未先經篩測」、「既有製程及廢水處理設施位置未列入評估調查範圍」、「未對有機物採樣分析的樣品，輔以PID/FID的篩測，以決定分析的樣品」等3項。此外，為了有效管制技師簽證業務，本計畫同時進行環工技師基本管理系統之規劃與建置工作，藉由網路資料庫提供各級環保主管機關了解技師基本資料、簽證狀況、接受查核結果及獎懲等紀錄，以落實技師簽證管考。本計畫另一工作項目則持續協助評析環境工程技師、環境工程業及環境類技術顧問公司之法制研議，協助研議與技師法、技師考試法等相關法規修正意見之彙整，必要時，協助因應立法院提出相關議案，研提對案相關資料。

中文關鍵字

簽證，查核，管理系統

類型	檔名	檔案大小	說明	最新版公開日期
期末報告	成果報告.pdf	11MB		2014/2/1 上午 12:00:00

摘要	The objectives of Exective Yuan EPA’s registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certifications processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification engineers and to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operations of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points were focused on inspection of work drafts. This year the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects were that " the front page of the work draft is not signed and stamped with professional seal”, around 30%; “work drat not saved”, “for certification cases that need calculations have no related documents saved”, and “unreasonable review results or inconsistent with the contents of the documents”, around 20% each. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defects were that "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 65%; "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 35%; and "the contaminants in the raw materials were not listed in wastewater water quality items", around 19%. The most frequent defects appeared on stationary source onsite review was also "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent"; "in the application documents, relevant drawings were not indicated with process equipment (E), air pollution control facilities (A), powder material conveying devices transfer points (C), storage sites (X), storage tanks (T) and discharge points (P)”; and “unreasonable design and operation parameters for the processing units of the pollution control facilities transfer device”, around 21% each. For soil and underground water remediation certification cases, the most frequent appearing review defects were “the soil evaluation shows heavy metal contamination, however, the sampling and analysis were not prescreened”,“the locations of existing process and wastewater treatment facilities were not listed in the scope of evaluation studies”,and“the organic sampling and analysis samples, were not prescreened with PID/FID to determine samples for analysis” etc.three items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist the evaluation of regulation development for registered professional environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant companies, the collection of comments for relevant amendments for professional engineer law, professional engineer examination law etc., and if necessary, assist the legislative Yuan to submit relevant bills,and study the relevant information for these bills.
英文關鍵字	certification, review, management information system;certification, review, management information system

摘要

The objectives of Exective Yuan EPA’s registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certifications processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification engineers and to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operations of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points were focused on inspection of work drafts. This year the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent defects were that " the front page of the work draft is not signed and stamped with professional seal”, around 30%; “work drat not saved”, “for certification cases that need calculations have no related documents saved”, and “unreasonable review results or inconsistent with the contents of the documents”, around 20% each. For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defects were that "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 65%; "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 35%; and "the contaminants in the raw materials were not listed in wastewater water quality items", around 19%. The most frequent defects appeared on stationary source onsite review was also "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent"; "in the application documents, relevant drawings were not indicated with process equipment (E), air pollution control facilities (A), powder material conveying devices transfer points (C), storage sites (X), storage tanks (T) and discharge points (P)”; and “unreasonable design and operation parameters for the processing units of the pollution control facilities transfer device”, around 21% each. For soil and underground water remediation certification cases, the most frequent appearing review defects were “the soil evaluation shows heavy metal contamination, however, the sampling and analysis were not prescreened”,“the locations of existing process and wastewater treatment facilities were not listed in the scope of evaluation studies”,and“the organic sampling and analysis samples, were not prescreened with PID/FID to determine samples for analysis” etc.three items. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications. Another objective of this program is to continuously assist the evaluation of regulation development for registered professional environmental engineers, environmental engineering industry and environmental consultant companies, the collection of comments for relevant amendments for professional engineer law, professional engineer examination law etc., and if necessary, assist the legislative Yuan to submit relevant bills,and study the relevant information for these bills.

英文關鍵字

certification, review, management information system;certification, review, management information system